Re: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List

2011-01-26 Thread Robert Jordan
On 26.01.2011 19:53, Troy Howard wrote: Regarding Mono support, I think providing a MonoDevelop compatible solution file, and testing builds in at least one standard Linux environment will be necessary. I'd suggest Ubuntu 10.4 or 10.10. Ubuntu 10.4 comes with Mono 2-4 which is too old for Lucen

Re: Build & CI Considerations

2011-01-26 Thread Michael Herndon
Robert, > . > I don't believe this is necessary. At least there were no requests for alternative build systems in the past. There may never be a need for the alternative building scripts, its was more of a curious question. I've seen a few projects on github use both albacore and psake. Maybe it

Re: Stefan's Newbie Questions (was Re: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List)

2011-01-26 Thread Hans Merkl
That's only IF there is such a tradeoff. From what I have read IKVM is as fast as Lucene.NET. I agree with DIGY about not hijacking this thread. I think I have started this. On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 16:38, Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP] < casper...@caspershouse.com> wrote: > As a consumer (and I

RE: Stefan's Newbie Questions (was Re: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List)

2011-01-26 Thread Digy
I think we should discuss it later not to hijack this thread.. DIGY -Original Message- From: Hans Merkl [mailto:h...@hmerkl.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 11:29 PM To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Stefan's Newbie Questions (was Re: Proposal Status, Initial Committ

RE: Stefan's Newbie Questions (was Re: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List)

2011-01-26 Thread Nicholas Paldino [.NET/C# MVP]
As a consumer (and I think that most consumers would agree), I'd have to disagree STRONGLY on trading off performance for ease of conversion. Lucene and Lucene.NET is predicated on performance, compromising that, IMO, runs contrary to the core principals of Lucene. - Nick -Original M

Re: Stefan's Newbie Questions (was Re: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List)

2011-01-26 Thread Hans Merkl
I use it in my desktop app and it works great. My app gets distributed and with TIKA I know what I get on the customer machine. With IFilter you never know... On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 15:55, Digy wrote: > Although TIKA is a very good project, I've never needed it in windows > environment. Using I

Re: Stefan's Newbie Questions (was Re: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List)

2011-01-26 Thread Troy Howard
I'm on the fence about IKVM. It has some significant benefits and some significant drawbacks: Benefits: - Allows us to get to a "commoditized" line-by-line .NET DLL in the fastest and easiest manner. No porting. - Reasonable performance profile - Well tested Java environment equivalence Drawback

Re: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List

2011-01-26 Thread Robert Jordan
Michael, On 26.01.2011 19:18, Michael Herndon wrote: Should the project include build scripts for powershell, nant, albacore scripts? (would this further entice developers to download the code and build it)? These also could be available as a separate download. I don't believe this is necessa

Re: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List

2011-01-26 Thread Troy Howard
Apache has a number of CI options available... For details, see: http://ci.apache.org/ I'd suggest Hudson. Regarding Mono support, I think providing a MonoDevelop compatible solution file, and testing builds in at least one standard Linux environment will be necessary. I'd suggest Ubuntu 10.4 or

Re: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List

2011-01-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2011-01-26, Michael Herndon wrote: > supposedly the wiki used to be:http://wiki.apache.org/lucene.net/ according > to http://incubator.apache.org/projects/lucene.net.html but thats currently > not resolving. is there (linked from the main W

Lucene.NET Wiki

2011-01-26 Thread Lombard, Scott
Troy referenced http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/lucene.Net in the proposal so I am going to go with that. I will am going to create some stuff feel free to edit. Scott -Original Message- From: mhern...@amptools.net [mailto:mhern...@amptools.net] On Behalf Of Michael Herndon Sen

Stefan's Newbie Questions (was Re: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List)

2011-01-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
[changing the subject to keep the other thread clean] Thanks for your answers, Scott. On 2011-01-26, Lombard, Scott wrote: > On 2011-01-26, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> * have you considered IKVM rather than a line-by-line translation? > The end idea is to port Lucene with both an automated line-

Re: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List

2011-01-26 Thread Michael Herndon
supposedly the wiki used to be:http://wiki.apache.org/lucene.net/ according to http://incubator.apache.org/projects/lucene.net.html but thats currently not resolving.

RE: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List

2011-01-26 Thread Lombard, Scott
On 2011-01-26, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >On 2011-01-26, Michael Herndon wrote: > >> Is there anything else that needs to be submitted or that we are waiting on >> to call for a vote? >Everything is in place, IMHO. I've seen Grant thinks you need one more >mentor but other proposals have passed the

Re: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List

2011-01-26 Thread Michael Herndon
Is there anything else that needs to be submitted or that we are waiting on to call for a vote? Anything we should be looking at doing in short term/mean time while that is taking place ?