On 2011-02-23, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Not only cosmetic:
* The NOTICE file contains a bad copyright year and doesn't talk about
Lucene.NET at all. Make that Lucene.NET rather than Lucene and
2006-2011.
* LICENSE talks about src/java/org/apache/lucene/util/UnicodeUtil.java
and
Stefan,
I'm pretty close to finishing a second release candidate... Been busy
today/yesterday.
Thanks,
Troy
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 1:25 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2011-02-23, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Not only cosmetic:
* The NOTICE file contains a bad copyright year and
On 2011-02-25, Troy Howard wrote:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 1:25 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
Unless anybody yells I'll put some time aside today to create a patch
that fixes the issues in trunk and should hopefully be easy to merge to
the 2.9.2 tag/branch and will attach it to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12999301#comment-12999301
]
Andrey commented on LUCENENET-400:
--
I recommended to use for CI a
No problem. Updated them, and a new release candidate is ready (posting now).
Thanks,
Troy
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 3:17 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote:
On 2011-02-25, thow...@apache.org wrote:
Added app.configs (missing from previous commit)
They need licenses as well. Sorry
All,
This vote is being closed as not passing due to the valid issues Stefan raised.
Thanks,
Troy
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Troy Howard thowar...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
I'm happy to announce that Lucene.Net 2.9.2-incubating-RC1 is
available and ready for your testing and voting.
All,
I'm happy to announce that Lucene.Net 2.9.2-incubating-RC2 is
available and ready for your testing and voting.
Release candidate artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~thoward/Lucene.Net/2.9.2-incubating-RC2/dist/
SVN tag revision:
Troy,
The source in the SVN tag does not build:
Lucene.Net.Core.sln(1): Solution file error MSB5014: File format version is not
recognized. MSBuild can only read solution files between versions 7.0 and 9.0,
inclusive.
- Neal
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard
It's a VS2010 solution file. What version are you using?
Thanks,
Troy
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Granroth, Neal V.
neal.granr...@thermofisher.com wrote:
Troy,
The source in the SVN tag does not build:
Lucene.Net.Core.sln(1): Solution file error MSB5014: File format version is
not
We should probably include documentation somewhere that building
requires either MsBuild from 3.5 or higher .NET framework install or a
version of VS2010 (Express works fine).
Thanks,
Troy
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 7:49 AM, Troy Howard thowar...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a VS2010 solution file. What
Hi,
I've updated the RAT reports at
http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/Lucene.NET/
Binary looks good to me as I know the .xml files are generated, the
source archive still contains a file licensed under the 1.1 version
(TestSnowball.cs) and the .nunit, .config, .ndoc and build.xml files
could
What about this source tree?
RC2
build
contrib
core
Lucene.Net
Test
demo
src doesn't mean anything since other dirs contain sources as well.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 9:18 PM
On 2011-02-25, Troy Howard wrote:
I updated the .src zip and associated checksums/signatures at:
I have verified the bin zip is still the same that I checked. All
signatures and hashes are fine, RAT is reasonably happy with the src zip
(I've updated
Sounds good to me.
At some point I'd like to address namespace mappings too... But
perhaps that's best deferred for the 3.x reworking?
Also, there are a number of less-than-useful documentation files
(html) and other random files that seem to come from the Java world.
It would be nice to clean
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12999618#comment-12999618
]
Prescott Nasser commented on LUCENENET-377:
---
probably should wipe out the
Hi all,
I was wondering if someone of the committers or the contributors will be at the
MVP summit next week.
Would have been nice to have chat in person.
Simone
From PiyoPad
One thing I'm not quite following -- why does one need a solution for
every single project? Point of solution files is so one can have
multiple projects linked in realish time, so we probably need a single
solution for everything or perhaps two covering core lucene and
contrib.
On Fri, Feb 25,
First of all, I don't want to start a flame war. What I want to say is: This
is just what made sense while building this release might not make sense for
all.
(I must admit, it is better than the previous one)
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Hey all,
I've uploaded two potential new layouts / site designs:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-403.
Troy has also hosted them live in his people.apache.org account:
http://people.apache.org/~thoward/Lucene.Net/site/layout1/
Oh, also, +1 for Layout1
~Prescott
From: geobmx...@hotmail.com
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:03:35 -0800
Subject: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] New website / layout looks
Hey all,
I've uploaded two potential new
20 matches
Mail list logo
