+1 (According to Digy's suggestion)
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Troy Howard thowar...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
Please cast your votes regarding the topic of .Net Framework support.
The question on the table is:
Should Apache Lucene.Net 2.9.4 be the last release which supports the
.Net
+1
one option is that we could go forward with .NET 4, but still keep a fix
branch that keeps the current .NET 2 based version free from bugs and
security issues that ppl report.
Simone
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Amanuel Workneh ma...@rotselleri.comwrote:
+1 (According to Digy's
This is my +1 as well
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 09:24:07 +0200
From: simone.chiare...@gmail.com
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] VOTE: .NET 2.0 Framework Support After Apache
Lucene.Net 2.9.4
+1
one option is that
+1, go for .NET 4...
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: 09 May 2011 21:05
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [Lucene.Net] VOTE: .NET 2.0 Framework Support After Apache Lucene.Net
2.9.4
All,
Please
+1, but I'm partial to 0 if the demand is there for it. I don't mind
keeping up support for 2.0, in a separate branch, for a set amount of time.
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 2:01 AM, Moray McConnachie
mmcco...@oxford-analytica.com wrote:
PS: If you are supporting .NET 3.5 then you get .NET 2.0
+1, burn the ships.
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Christopher Currens
currens.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
+1, but I'm partial to 0 if the demand is there for it. I don't mind
keeping up support for 2.0, in a separate branch, for a set amount of time.
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 2:01 AM, Moray
I've cast my vote already, but +1 to Wyatt's expression
-Original Message-
From: Wyatt Barnett [mailto:wyatt.barn...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 12:46 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] VOTE: .NET 2.0 Framework Support After Apache
Lucene.Net
