d that so many of you fought to keep alive over the
> past year? There's no guarantee that what's on Nuget will be the
official
> releases/builds that come out of this project, and I'm a little
surprised
> there isn't more concern over that aspect either.
>
> Ju
September 21, 2011 10:07 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Nuget, Lucene.Net, and Your Thoughts
Michael - Could be wrong, but I think Nick might have gotten you
confused with Neal.
Regardless, I completely agree with everything you just said.
And, Yay for NuGe
n official distro? Aren't you concerned about
>> the
>> integrity of the brand that so many of you fought to keep alive over the
>> past year? There's no guarantee that what's on Nuget will be the official
>> releases/builds that come out of this project,
there isn't more concern over that aspect either.
>
> Just my $0.02
>
> - Nick
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Digy [mailto:digyd...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 7:06 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Nug
, and I'm a little surprised
there isn't more concern over that aspect either.
Just my $0.02
- Nick
-Original Message-
From: Digy [mailto:digyd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 7:06 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Nuget, Lucene.Net
Not that old :)
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 2:14 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Nuget, Lucene.Net, and Your Thoughts
Punch cards or bust!
Sent from my Windows Phone
: [Lucene.Net] Nuget, Lucene.Net, and Your Thoughts
Any particular reason you guys are not interested in NuGet?
Aaron Powell
MVP - Internet Explorer (Development) | FunnelWeb Team Member
http://apowell.me | http://twitter.com/slace | Skype: aaron.l.powell |
Github | BitBucket
-Original Message
]
Sent: Thursday, 22 September 2011 7:42 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Nuget, Lucene.Net, and Your Thoughts
Sorry, but I feel the same as Neal.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Granroth, Neal V. [mailto:neal.granr...@thermofisher.com]
Sent: Wednesday
don [mailto:mhern...@wickedsoftware.net]
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 1:36 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Nuget, Lucene.Net, and Your Thoughts
@Digy, that could be done post build with ILMerge or build an additional
uber assembly that stores other assemblies a
e-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Nuget, Lucene.Net, and Your Thoughts
>
> While it may be a bit redundant, why couldn't there be an individual
> package for each piece of contrib and a "Lucene.Net Contrib (All)"
> package that drags them all down.
Use a Lucene.Net core package for the core, and separate packages for each
contrib. That makes the most sense, and that is how most projects work. This
is also how Java Lucene does.
Don't create a nightly nuget package - nuget should only be used for
distribution packages
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, 21 September 2011 2:05 PM
> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Nuget, Lucene.Net, and Your Thoughts
> >
> >
> >> Right now there are two packages: Lucen
(Development) | FunnelWeb Team Member
>
> http://apowell.me | http://twitter.com/slace | Skype: aaron.l.powell | Github
> | BitBucket
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 21 September 2011 2:05 PM
> To: lucene-
ssage-
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 21 September 2011 2:05 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Nuget, Lucene.Net, and Your Thoughts
> Right now there are two packages: Lucene & Lucene.Contrib. My question
> to the
> Right now there are two packages: Lucene & Lucene.Contrib. My question to
> the community is do you wish to finer grain packages, i.e. a package for
> each contrib project or continue to keep it simple.
>
+1 Granular, we just need to be good about descriptions.
>
> Another topic to converse
We're taking a quick poll over the next few days to see how people would
like use Lucene.Net through Nuget on the developers mailing list**
Currently version 2.9.2 is hosted on nuget.org, but that package was not
create by the project maintainers, thus nuget is not currently set up in
source. Goi
16 matches
Mail list logo
