RE: [Lucene.Net] Official stance on API changes between major versions

2012-03-03 Thread Alex Thompson
[mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 10:03 PM To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] Official stance on API changes between major versions Andy, I appreciate your coppers. Everyone is really quiet, It seems you want us to move forward, I want us to move

RE: [Lucene.Net] Official stance on API changes between major versions

2012-03-01 Thread Prescott Nasser
-net-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Official stance on API changes between major versions I am not a commiter but my company makes extensive use of Lucene.net. So here's my two pennies... I understand that there is a commendable motivation to be gentle with api changes

[Lucene.Net] Official stance on API changes between major versions

2012-02-24 Thread Christopher Currens
A bit of background about what I've been doing lately on the project. Because we've now confirmed that the .NET 3.0.3 branch is a completed port of Java 3.0.3 version, I've been spending time trying to work on some of the bugs and improvements that are assigned to this version. There wasn't any

RE: [Lucene.Net] Official stance on API changes between major versions

2012-02-24 Thread Prescott Nasser
: Christopher Currens Sent: 2/24/2012 2:45 PM To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: [Lucene.Net] Official stance on API changes between major versions A bit of background about what I've been doing lately on the project. Because we've now confirmed that the .NET 3.0.3 branch is a completed port