WPF application and I suppose we want the resulting
application to run under Mono. I suggest we use the Pasha Bizhan version. I
have made a 2.9.2-version and if we agree that we want to continue with the
Bizhan version work can begin.
> Luke.Net for Luc
On 2011-02-21, Troy Howard wrote:
> As a general question about process around accepting software
> contributions, one thing I'm a little confused about: How does
> accepting this contribution differ from a normal contribution?
Not much.
> By that I mean, suppose a developer contributed a signif
On 2011-02-18, Troy Howard wrote:
> Pending resolution of the legal issues around ingesting the code into
> Lucene.Net,
All it takes is:
* attach the code to a JIRA ticket.
* have software grants signed by all contributors to the original code
base.
* write a single page for the Incubator si
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12996708#comment-12996708
]
Scott Lombard commented on LUCENENET-391:
-
Public fork of Luke.Ne
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Lombard updated LUCENENET-391:
Component/s: Lucene.Net Contrib
Description: .net port of Luke.Net for
Pending resolution of the legal issues around ingesting the code into
Lucene.Net, I've created a public fork of Luke.Net on bitbucket as a
staging area to prepare the code for ingestion. Sergey will be working
on it there.
Thanks,
Troy
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 6:23 AM, Stefan Bodewig
On 2011-02-18, Aaron Powell wrote:
> Yeah I'm actually quite lax about remembering to put license on my
> code. I've just thrown up the MIT license on it.
Thanks.
> I'll speak to my colleague, but I know I didn't work on it during work time
Depending on your legislation (and your contract) your
tp://www.aaron-powell.com | http://twitter.com/slace | Skype:
> aaron.l.powell | MSN: aaz...@hotmail.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org]
> Sent: Friday, 18 February 2011 10:50 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
>
on-powell.com | http://twitter.com/slace | Skype: aaron.l.powell
| MSN: aaz...@hotmail.com
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, 18 February 2011 10:50 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Luke.Net
On 2011-02-18, Troy Howard wrote:
ll you can't change the license without Aaron's consent - and
that of all other people who have contributed to Luke.NET so far (I'm
assuming it is just Aaron's colleague). I've just performed a cursory
look right now and can't find any information about Luke.NET'
; aaron.l.powell | MSN: aaz...@hotmail.com
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, 18 February 2011 8:51 PM
>> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
>> Cc: Aaron Powell
>> Subject: Re: Luke.Net
mber
>
> http://www.aaron-powell.com | http://twitter.com/slace | Skype:
> aaron.l.powell | MSN: aaz...@hotmail.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, 18 February 2011 8:51 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apac
| MSN: aaz...@hotmail.com
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, 18 February 2011 8:51 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Cc: Aaron Powell
Subject: Re: Luke.Net
Aaron,
That's awesome!
Would you be opposed to us importing this in the Lucene.Net r
ve a bit of a hand.
>
> Neither of us have time to run this project so I'm throwing it open if anyone
> else wants to work on it you'll find the repo here:
> http://hg.slace.biz/luke.net/overview
>
> Nothing overly exciting, it's a basic WPF app so far, runnin
A while ago I started working on a port of Luke for .NET, and a colleague of
mine also gave a bit of a hand.
Neither of us have time to run this project so I'm throwing it open if anyone
else wants to work on it you'll find the repo here:
http://hg.slace.biz/luke.net/overview
Noth
archives.
> Luke.Net for Lucene.Net
> ---
>
> Key: LUCENENET-391
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-391
> Project: Lucene.Net
> Issue Type: New Feature
>Reporter: P
been considering doing something similar for
some time mainly so that I could integrate our own analyzers and query language.
However, I can't open any of my indexes.
I've looked at the src and it seems it's built against Lucene.net 1.4. Is this
right?
> L
> Luke.Net for Lucene.Net
> ---
>
> Key: LUCENENET-391
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-391
> Project: Lucene.Net
> Issue Type: New Feature
>Reporter: Pasha Bizhan
>
Luke.Net for Lucene.Net
---
Key: LUCENENET-391
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-391
Project: Lucene.Net
Issue Type: New Feature
Reporter: Pasha Bizhan
Priority: Minor
.net
19 matches
Mail list logo
