If it's easier to keep the sync between java and C# with Sharpen, the
price of the sharpen-specific classes is maybe not that high.
My 2 cents
Regards,
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 14:08:02 -0500 (EST), "Neal Granroth (JIRA)"
wrote:
> [
>
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-380?page=com.atlas
07, 2011 7:53 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-380) Evaluate Sharpen as a port
tool
Nice work Alex!
Not that this represents a solution, but I did load up the core source from
your conversion into a VS2010 project, then ran Resharper's code cl
(needs
"Generics")
* There is a very fast LRU cache impl. (SimpleLRUCache). (needs "Generics")
PS: This not a complete list and there may be many others from other
contributers of Lucene.Net
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Peter Mateja [mailto:peter.mat...@gmail.com
]
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 2:43 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-380) Evaluate Sharpen as a port
tool
The amount of custom work required for the conversion is starting to concern
me a bit. Well, to clarify, the work itself doesn't conce
