Re: [Lucene.Net] Re: Luke.Net

2011-02-21 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2011-02-21, Troy Howard wrote: > As a general question about process around accepting software > contributions, one thing I'm a little confused about: How does > accepting this contribution differ from a normal contribution? Not much. > By that I mean, suppose a developer contributed a signif

Re: Luke.Net

2011-02-19 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2011-02-18, Troy Howard wrote: > Pending resolution of the legal issues around ingesting the code into > Lucene.Net, All it takes is: * attach the code to a JIRA ticket. * have software grants signed by all contributors to the original code base. * write a single page for the Incubator si

Re: Luke.Net

2011-02-18 Thread Troy Howard
Pending resolution of the legal issues around ingesting the code into Lucene.Net, I've created a public fork of Luke.Net on bitbucket as a staging area to prepare the code for ingestion. Sergey will be working on it there. Thanks, Troy On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 6:23 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On

Re: Luke.Net

2011-02-18 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2011-02-18, Aaron Powell wrote: > Yeah I'm actually quite lax about remembering to put license on my > code. I've just thrown up the MIT license on it. Thanks. > I'll speak to my colleague, but I know I didn't work on it during work time Depending on your legislation (and your contract) your

Re: Luke.Net

2011-02-18 Thread Sergey Mirvoda
tp://www.aaron-powell.com | http://twitter.com/slace | Skype: > aaron.l.powell | MSN: aaz...@hotmail.com > > > -Original Message- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org] > Sent: Friday, 18 February 2011 10:50 PM > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org >

RE: Luke.Net

2011-02-18 Thread Aaron Powell
on-powell.com | http://twitter.com/slace | Skype: aaron.l.powell | MSN: aaz...@hotmail.com -Original Message- From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org] Sent: Friday, 18 February 2011 10:50 PM To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Luke.Net On 2011-02-18, Troy Howard wrote:

Re: Luke.Net

2011-02-18 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2011-02-18, Troy Howard wrote: > Sergey is already planning to include the Apache License header in the > files when he imports them. Other than that, is there any legal > process we need to go through to bring this code into the Lucene.Net > fold? Yes, absolutely. First of all you can't chan

Re: Luke.Net

2011-02-18 Thread Troy Howard
; aaron.l.powell | MSN: aaz...@hotmail.com >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Friday, 18 February 2011 8:51 PM >> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org >> Cc: Aaron Powell >> Subject: Re: Luke.Net

Re: Luke.Net

2011-02-18 Thread Sergey Mirvoda
mber > > http://www.aaron-powell.com | http://twitter.com/slace | Skype: > aaron.l.powell | MSN: aaz...@hotmail.com > > -Original Message- > From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, 18 February 2011 8:51 PM > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apac

RE: Luke.Net

2011-02-18 Thread Aaron Powell
| MSN: aaz...@hotmail.com -Original Message- From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, 18 February 2011 8:51 PM To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org Cc: Aaron Powell Subject: Re: Luke.Net Aaron, That's awesome! Would you be opposed to us importing this in the Lucene.Net r

Re: Luke.Net

2011-02-18 Thread Troy Howard
Aaron, That's awesome! Would you be opposed to us importing this in the Lucene.Net respository, and maintaining it here? Thanks, Troy On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:47 AM, Aaron Powell wrote: > A while ago I started working on a port of Luke for .NET, and a colleague of > mine also gave a bit of