RE: is this possible in a query?

Thanks. The analyzer is actually my own code, so I don't mind rewriting it. This was just a matter of not seeing all of the possibilities when doing the initial coding... No big deal, except that for one of our customers reindexing takes 5+ hours... Luckily they only use it during business hours.

RE: is this possible in a query?

This is a long shot but if you want you search to yield exact results alone on that specific field, you might wannna think about replacing the spaces between words with underscores (make sure the analyzer doesn't split them up) and then apply that same rule to the query string in the sense that "C

RE: Using Filters in Lucene

My index changes ( updates every 15 minutes and delete every 2 minutes ) so using the filter is not going to work for me because the order of the Documents might change from the time the initial search is done to the time the filter is done, I'm currently using a crude method ( ... doc_id:(23 AND

Re: is this possible in a query?

I think this may be what I end up doing... Unfortunately this means reindexing the documents... thanks, rob http://www.robdecker.com/ http://www.planetside.com/ On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > if you make the product name a type Field.Keyword, it will still be > indexed and sear

Re: is this possible in a query?

I assume that "OrthoMed NOT Cathflo" (or OrthoMed NOT "Cathflow OrthoMed") doesn't work for you? I'm not clear what you mean when you specify it must be generic to work with all products. Regards, Terry - Original Message - From: "Robert A. Decker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Lucene Users

Re: is this possible in a query?

This depends on your analyzer. Currently it splits on words. How do you want it to split? Is there other text around this? I guess you could write your own analyzer that if it finds a special phrase it would add it as a phrase. If you did it this way, you would have to use similar methodology to

Re: is this possible in a query?

if you make the product name a type Field.Keyword, it will still be indexed and searchable, but will not be tokenized. --dmg - Original Message - From: "Robert A. Decker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 5:07 pm Subject: is this possible in a query? > I have a Text Fie

is this possible in a query?

I have a Text Field named product. Two of the products are: Cathflo OrthoMed OrthoMed When I search for "Cathflo OrthoMed", I correctly only get items that have the product "Cathflo OrthoMed". However, when I search for "OrthoMed", not only do I get all "OrthoMed" products, but I also get all "Ca

RE: Using Filters in Lucene

Cool. But instead of adding a new class, why not change Hits to inherit from Filter and add the bits() method to it? Then one could "pipe" the output of one Query into another search without modifying the Queries... Scott > -Original Message- > From: Doug Cutting [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT

RE: Size Capabilities of Lucene Index

since it's file system based index I don't see any limitations other than OS max file size, and Imagine if you're data is 3 Terabytes you have monster machines with monster memory (you'll need it) also you'll need to max up the file handle set up on the OS and probably use a high MERGE_FACTOR. PS

Size Capabilites of Lucene Index

Can anyone tell me the amount of data that Lucene is able to index? Can it handle up to 3 Terrabytes, how large are the indexes it creates, (1/2 the size of the data)? Thanks, Scott The information contained in this mes

Como compilar arquivos .jj

Hellow, I am trying executes the example IndexHTML, but in this example two classes generated by javacc, StandadTokenizer.jj and HTMLParser.jj are used, and I don't know as compiling these classes. How can I solve this? At once I thank . Wender Magno Cota _