Hello,
I modified the IndexHTML.java and let the jsp files be indexed, but the source code of
the jsp tags such as <%@page import... shows up in the result summary.
I checked this mailing list messages, someone suggested to modify the HTMLParser.jj
file to make the jsp tag text as the 3rd
That's too old. Get the recent nightly build.
Otis
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Otis:
> I'm using 1.2-RC5.
> --David
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Monday, August 12, 2002 12:07 pm
> Subject: Re: Loss of wildcard when search term is
Otis:
I'm using 1.2-RC5.
--David
- Original Message -
From: Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday, August 12, 2002 12:07 pm
Subject: Re: Loss of wildcard when search term is quoted with
StandardAnalyzer
> Which version of Lucene are you using?
> This should work with the l
Assumption correct. I think this may be in the jGuru's Lucene FAQ.
Otis
--- Minh Kama Yie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Again, this might seem a little naive but is it possible to do
> searches with '*' preceding a term?
> I'm assuming not?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Regards,
>
Which version of Lucene are you using?
This should work with the latest (nightly) versions.
There are even tests that excercise this functionality and they pass.
Otis
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> For an index created with StandardAnalyzer, with fields called
> "go_desc"
> and "pu_desc", I cons
Yes, I too would be interested in a Portuguese analyzer.
-Original Message-
From: Maurits van Wijland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2002 11:20 PM
To: Lucene Users List
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Portuguese Analyser
Hi Bizu,
please send the source also to
I want to boost terms found in header lines of HTML pages more than those found in
other parts of the text. (just an example which can be applied to different use cases).
Therefore I put text enclosed with tags in a special field (call it "hd") and the
other text in another field.
How can I re
thank you, that works! :-) and saves my day!
mvh karl øie
-Original Message-
From: Terry Steichen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10. august 2002 18:29
To: Lucene Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Problems understanding RangeQuery...
Hi Karl,
I have discovered that with ra
I know it's not the most efficient way but I do close the searched after
every search using:
searcher.close() ;
This saves me the hassle of worrying about memory problems, and the search
on my system is quite intensive about half a million searches a day, I
haven't faced any problems with the open
