Re: Locks and Readers and Writers

2004-10-29 Thread Christoph Kiehl
Morus Walter wrote: AFAIK you should never open an IndexWriter and an IndexReader at the same time. You should use only one of them at a time but you may open as many IndexSearchers as you like for searching. You cannot open an IndexSearcher without opening an IndexReader (explicitly or implicitl

[OT] Re: Lots Of Interest in Lucene Desktop

2004-10-29 Thread petite_abeille
On Oct 28, 2004, at 20:26, Kevin A. Burton wrote: http://www.peerfear.org/rss/permalink/2004/10/28/ LotsOfInterestInLuceneDesktop/ Many people, few ideas :) http://www.popsearch.net/index.html PA. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: Question about PorterStemFilter class

2004-10-29 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
Redirecting to lucene-user list. Hello, 1) that's part of the porter stemming algorithm (see Dr. Porter's web site for more info). If you are indexing/searching Spanish text, you probably shouldn't be using PorterStemFilter. 2) I can't tell from the description. Could be one of those unfortuna

Re: Locks and Readers and Writers

2004-10-29 Thread yahootintin . 1247688
Hi Christoph, Thats what I thought. But what I'm seeing is this: - open reader for searching (the reader is opening an index on a remote machine (via UNC) which takes a couple seconds) - meanwhile the other service opens an IndexWriter and adds a document (the index writer determines that i

RE: Search.jhtml ?

2004-10-29 Thread Willy De Waele
First at all, thanks for you answer. Now I get some results with the jsp's, but the url's in de result is not clickeable ... Is this normal? (should I modify the template?) TIA & Regards Willy -Original Message- From: Daniel Naber [mailto:[EMAIL PR

Re: Search.jhtml ?

2004-10-29 Thread Daniel Naber
On Friday 29 October 2004 18:12, Willy De Waele wrote: > Now I get some results with the jsp's, but the url's in de > result is not clickeable ... > Is this normal? (should I modify the template?) The template expects fields "title" and "url" in the index (and stored), if these a

Re: new version of NewMultiFieldQueryParser

2004-10-29 Thread Bill Janssen
> Strange .. on my computer was created just someting like > > default:foobar > > ... and I think that should work like that on your computer too ... I've > take a look on lucene code ... and I undestood why ... > all the best ... Sergiu So, why? Try running the program at ftp://ftp.parc.xerox

Re: new version of NewMultiFieldQueryParser

2004-10-29 Thread Bill Janssen
> wouldn't it be better to go on and overwrite the methods creating these > types of queries too? There's no need to. My existing code works just fine with them. For instance, if you put in the query "foo*", with the default fields "title", "authors", and "contents", you get the expanded query

When do document ids change

2004-10-29 Thread Justin Swanhart
Given an FSDirectory based index A. Documents are added to A with an IndexWriter minMergeDocs = 2 mergeFactor = 3 Documents are never deleted. Once the RAMDirectory merges documents to the index: a) will the documentID values for index A ever change? b) can a mapping between a term in th

Re: When do document ids change

2004-10-29 Thread Paul Elschot
Justin, On Friday 29 October 2004 20:48, you wrote: > Given an FSDirectory based index A. > Documents are added to A with an IndexWriter > minMergeDocs = 2 > mergeFactor = 3 > > Documents are never deleted. > > Once the RAMDirectory merges documents to the index: > > a) will the docume

Re: Search.jhtml ?

2004-10-29 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Oct 29, 2004, at 12:12 PM, Willy De Waele wrote: First at all, thanks for you answer. Now I get some results with the jsp's, but the url's in de result is not clickeable ... Is this normal? (should I modify the template?) It's a known issue that the Lucene web demo is quite s

Re: new version of NewMultiFieldQueryParser

2004-10-29 Thread Daniel Naber
On Friday 29 October 2004 20:42, Bill Janssen wrote: > Try running the program at > ftp://ftp.parc.xerox.com/transient/janssen/SearchTest.java, and see > how that works for you. ÂSeems to work fine with Java 1.4.2 and Lucene > 1.4.1, for me. That seems to be the old version that doesn't implement