RE: Lucene with English and Spanish Best Practice?

2004-08-23 Thread Chad Small
Thanks for the info Grant. As for indexes, do you anticipate adding more fields later in Spanish? Is the content just a translation of the English, or do you have separate conetent in Spanish? Are your users querying in only one language (cross-lingual) or are the Spanish speakers only

RE: spanish stemmer

2004-08-23 Thread Chad Small
Do you mind sharing how you implemented your SpanishAnalyzer using Snowball? Sorry I can't help with your question. I am trying to implement Snowball Spanish or a Spanish Analyzer in Lucene. thanks, chad. -Original Message- From: Ernesto De Santis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

RE: spanish stemmer

2004-08-23 Thread Chad Small
- From: Chad Small [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Lucene Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 3:49 PM Subject: RE: spanish stemmer Do you mind sharing how you implemented your SpanishAnalyzer using Snowball? Sorry I can't help with your question. I am trying to implement Snowball

RE: spanish stemmer

2004-08-23 Thread Chad Small
, and SpanishStemmer donĀ“t have a default stopword set. SnowballAnalyzer constructor: /** Builds the named analyzer with no stop words. */ public SnowballAnalyzer(String name) { this.name = name; } Note the comment. Bye, Ernesto. - Original Message - From: Chad Small [EMAIL PROTECTED

Lucene with English and Spanish Best Practice?

2004-08-20 Thread Chad Small
Hello, I'm interested in any feedback from anyone who has worked through implementing Internationalization (I18N) search with Lucene or has ideas for this requirement. Currently, we're using Lucene with straight English and are looking to add Spanish to the mix (with maybe more languages to

RE: Searching in all

2004-04-01 Thread Chad Small
See MultiFieldQueryParser, like this: String[] fields = getFieldsArray(); Query multiFieldQuery = MultiFieldQueryParser.parse(this.queryString, fields, new

RE: too many files open error

2004-03-26 Thread Chad Small
Is this :) serious? Because we have a need/interest in the new field sorting capabilities and QueryParser keyword handling of dashes (-) that would be in 1.4, I believe. It's so much easier to explain that we'll use a final release of Lucene instead of a dev build Lucene. If so, what

Lucene 1.4 - lobby for final release

2004-03-26 Thread Chad Small
] Sent: Fri 3/26/2004 1:25 PM To: Lucene Users List Cc: Subject: Re: too many files open error On Mar 26, 2004, at 1:33 PM, Chad Small wrote: Is this :) serious? This is open-source. I'm only as serious as it would

RE: Query syntax on Keyword field question

2004-03-24 Thread Chad Small
, chad. -Original Message- From: Morus Walter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 3/24/2004 1:43 AM To: Lucene Users List Cc: Subject: RE: Query syntax on Keyword field question Chad Small writes: Here

RE: Query syntax on Keyword field question

2004-03-24 Thread Chad Small
thanks. I was in the process of getting javacc3.2 setup. I'll have to hunt for 2.x. chad. -Original Message- From: Morus Walter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 3/24/2004 8:00 AM To: Lucene Users List Cc: Subject: RE: Query

RE: Query syntax on Keyword field question

2004-03-24 Thread Chad Small
For others reference - here is the old version url: https://javacc.dev.java.net/servlets/ProjectDocumentList?folderID=212 -Original Message- From: Chad Small Sent: Wed 3/24/2004 8:07 AM To: Lucene Users List Cc: Subject: RE: Query

RE: Query syntax on Keyword field question

2004-03-24 Thread Chad Small
--- Chad Small [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: thanks. I was in the process of getting javacc3.2 setup. I'll have to hunt for 2.x. chad. -Original Message- From: Morus Walter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 3

RE: Query syntax on Keyword field question

2004-03-24 Thread Chad Small
Ahh, without the bin on the javacc.home - 3.2 seems to work for me to. -Original Message- From: Chad Small Sent: Wed 3/24/2004 8:34 AM To: Lucene Users List Cc: Subject: RE: Query syntax on Keyword field question

How to order search results by Field value?

2004-03-24 Thread Chad Small
Was there any conclusion to message: http://issues.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]msgNo=6762 Regarding Ordering by a Field? I have a similar need and didn't see the resolusion in that thread. Is it a current patch to the 1.3-final, I could see one? My other option, I guess, is

Query syntax on Keyword field question

2004-03-23 Thread Chad Small
Hello, How can I format a query to get a hit? I'm using the StandardAnalyzer() at both index and search time. If I'm indexing a field like this: luceneDocument.add(Field.Keyword(category,HW-NCI_TOPICS)); I've tried the following with no success: // String searchArgs =

RE: Query syntax on Keyword field question

2004-03-23 Thread Chad Small
that talked about having to use the the Query API when searching Keyword fields in the index. Is this true? Is there not a way to get the MultiFieldQueryParser to find a match on this keyword? thanks, chad. -Original Message- From: Chad Small Sent: Tue 3/23

RE: Query syntax on Keyword field question

2004-03-23 Thread Chad Small
Thanks-you Erik and Incze. I now understand the issue and I'm trying to create a KeywordAnalyzer as suggested from you book excerpt, Erik: http://issues.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]msgNo=6727 However, not being all that familiar with the Analyzer framework, I'm not sure how to

RE: Query syntax on Keyword field question

2004-03-23 Thread Chad Small
-NCI_TOPICS +space Actual :category:HW -nci topics +space See anything? thanks, chad. -Original Message- From: Chad Small Sent: Tue 3/23/2004 8:48 PM To: Lucene Users List Cc: Subject: RE: Query syntax on Keyword field question