Hi,
They're not encrypted. I can't help you with that but I remember seeing previous
messages regarding their contents. You might want
to take a look at the archives
(http://www.mail-archive.com/lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org/) or, better yet, the
source code ;-)
Regards,
--Daniel
> -Ori
For the developers list
http://www.mail-archive.com/lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org/
and the users list
http://www.mail-archive.com/lucene-user@jakarta.apache.org/
--Daniel
> -Original Message-
> From: Aruna Raghavan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: sexta-feira, 22 de fevereiro de 2002 1
Original Message-
> > From: Howk, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 2:49 PM
> > To: Lucene Mailing List (E-mail)
> > Subject: Index Locked For Write
> >
> >
> > We just got the newest daily build (to try
;
>
> Yes, + and - do work. In our UI, we try to validate the expression user
> entered by using pattern matching. I was trying to simplify this by simply
> using AND/OR and disallowing +/- (as it could be confusing to a user). I
> guess now the question is what causing the AND to fail? I
> From: Aruna Raghavan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Daniel,
> Thanks for the response but I am going by the definition of the
> Syntax in Lucene FAQ:
>
> According to the above, AND and OR should work too, right?
I'm afraid not. Have you tried '+' as I've suggested?
--Daniel
--
To unsubscri
Hi,
To achieve what you want, you need to use the required operand (+)
--Daniel
> -Original Message-
> From: Aruna Raghavan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: quinta-feira, 21 de fevereiro de 2002 13:44
> To: 'Lucene Users List'
> Subject: Boolean AND query
>
>
> Hello,
> Has anyone
I think you'd have to use the DateFilter. I've never used it myself but it shouldn't
be hard to use.
--Daniel
> -Original Message-
> From: Paulius Galubickas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: segunda-feira, 18 de fevereiro de 2002 08:04
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Indexing datab
> From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Ok, here's the patch. It includes my earlier patch with the "docweb"
> additions (see my previous patch for the related code). All I really did
> was paste in build.properties.
Yep, that's what I was expecting to see but since you know Ant a lot
efault location that is the recommend "home" for it and if
> it needs adjusting it would happen via build.properties or -D command-line
> switch.
>
> Again, I'm here to help and volunteer my Ant expertise to lucene-dev. Just
> e-mail me and ask!
>
> Erik
&g
Hi,
That's why I've suggested changes in build.xml to look for .ant.properties files
(posted in the developers list) but after reading
acoliver and Erik replies I agreed with them. The best option would be having all
properties defined in build.xml and eliminate
build.properties. Each user woul
I believe you have to install ant's optional package. You'll also need to have
JavaCC.zip and don't forget to configure javacc.home
in build.properties so it points to the right directory.
--Daniel
> -Original Message-
> From: Bizu de Anúncio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: quinta-fe
Hi,
I was thinking of implementing a search for similar documents (like some commercial
search engines do) and wondering if anyone has
already done something like that with Lucene. I thought of collecting all terms of the
selected document (or maybe some subset of
them) and then creating a Mult
Hi,
There's a demo that comes in lucene-1.2- rc3 that presents a way of doing this. I
believe it can give you a very good idea.
--Daniel
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: terça-feira, 12 de fevereiro de 2002 12:27
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gt; -org.apache.lucene.search.*;
> -org.apache.lucene.queryParser.*;
> -org.apache.lucene.demo.*;
> -org.apache.lucene.demo.html.Entities;
>
> I know that these are imported at the top of results.jsp but where should
> they be places within the Jakarta directory and where in lucene can I obtain
> them from ?
> From: Doug Cutting [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> It is most effiecient to batch deletions and insertions, i.e., perform a
> bunch of deletions on a single IndexReader, close it, then perform a bunch
> of insertions on a single IndexWriter. Usually the IndexReader that you do
> the deletions on
or the fix and, most important, for Lucene)
--Daniel
> -Original Message-
> From: Doug Cutting [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: domingo, 10 de fevereiro de 2002 19:55
> To: 'Lucene Users List'
> Subject: RE: problems with last patch (obtain write.lock while deleting
&g
Hi,
I've just updated my version (via CVS) and now I'm having problems with document
deletion. I'm trying to delete a document using
IndexReader's delete(Term) method and I'm getting an IOException:
java.io.IOException: Index locked for write: Lock@E:\temp\index\write.lock
at org.apache
Hi,
I forgot to mention that during this deletion there's no index writer opened and no
write lock in the index. The lock that's causing
the problem is created by the reader when invoking delete(docNum).
--Daniel
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Calvo [mailto:
Hi,
I've just updated to the latest version (to get the fix for the NullPointerException
with some phrase queries) and now I'm having
problems with document deletion. I'm trying to delete a document using delete(Term)
and I'm getting an IOException:
java.io.IOException: Index locked for write:
Hi
I've just tried with lucene-1.2-rc2 (same index and queries) and didn't have any
problem. Looks like something introduced after rc2
is broken.
--Daniel
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Calvo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: terca-feira, 5 de fevereiro
Hi,
I think I also had a problem like that.
I'm running lucene-1.2-rc3 with Tomcat 4.0.1 and I'm having a problem with a very
specific phrase query that is throwing a
NullPointerException. I have indexed an HTML document with the title "JavaServer
Pages(TM): A Developer's Perspective" and I ge
21 matches
Mail list logo
