Re: Lucene vs. in-DB-full-text-searching

2005-02-22 Thread David Sitsky
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005 09:31, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > You are right. > Since there are C++ and now C ports of Lucene, it would be interesting > to integrate them directly with DBs, so that the RDBMS full-text search > under the hood is actually powered by one of the Lucene ports. Or to see Lucene +

Re: Re: OutOfMemoryError

2004-08-18 Thread David Sitsky
> I tried to reuse the IndexSearcher, but I have another question. What > happen if an application server unloads the class after it is idle for a > while, and then re-instantiate the object back when it recieves a new > request? The EJB spec takes this into account, as there are hook methods you

Re: Query for the existence of a Lucene field in a document?

2004-05-25 Thread David Sitsky
On Tue, 25 May 2004 17:29, Ype Kingma wrote: > David, > > On Tuesday 25 May 2004 03:05, you wrote: > > I have an application using Lucene 1.3 final. > > > > In this application, I am loading data where the main text for each > > document is stored into a "body" field, a couple of other internal > >

Query for the existence of a Lucene field in a document?

2004-05-24 Thread David Sitsky
I have an application using Lucene 1.3 final. In this application, I am loading data where the main text for each document is stored into a "body" field, a couple of other internal fields, and basically some "meta-data fields" driven by the data being loaded, which can created Lucene fields lik

Memory requirements for optimize() on compound index high?

2004-05-10 Thread David Sitsky
Hi, I am working on an application which uses Lucene 1.3 Final which uses the compound index format on Win32 Sun JVM 1.4.1_02. I have set maxFieldLength for the index writer to 1,000,000, as often I have to index potentially very large documents, which contain information that must be indexed