I have used the in-memory array approach and it worked well. I was able to
return sorted result sets of over a million records in 500 milli-seconds.
The one down side to this is that keeping the arrays in memory really
limits your ability to add content because the new content needs to make
it
Yes, the BitSet has to be the same size as the number of documents in the
index.
If you have enough memory you could cache the BitSet in the VM's memory
rather
then storing it in a clob though.
Joel
- Original Message -
From: "Nader S. Henein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I thought Lucene didn't support left wildcards like the following:
*ucene
- Original Message -
From: "Christian Schrader" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lucene Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 7:14 PM
Subject: WildcardQuery
> I am pretty happy with the results of Wi
In our search application the user can turn stemming off and on.
With Lucene will I have to maintain two sets of indexes to create this functionality,
one
stemming and one non-stemming index?
Or
Is there a way to query a stemming index so that it does not return stems?
Thanks,
Joel
At my company we trying to decide on a new search engine.
I am very impressed with what I see with Lucene and am thinking very
seriously
of not going with AltaVista, FAST etc...
One of things that is very important to us is sorting by an integer or by a
date, which Lucene currently cannot do.
So
ieve wildcard
> searches are case sensitive.
> Aruna.
> -Original Message-
> From: Joel Bernstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 1:04 PM
> To: Lucene Users List
> Subject: 2 Questions
>
>
> 1)Does Lucine allow you to sort results by da
1)Does Lucine allow you to sort results by date?
2) How do you execute a wildcard search? I have
indexed four million documents using the SimpleAnalyzer. When
I execute a wildcard search using the SimpleAnalyzer the results returned
are always 0.
Thanks,
Joel
x is about 10 GB right now.
>
> I have not yet had any problems with "pushing the limits" of lucene.
>
> In the next few weeks, I will be pushing my number of indexed documents up
> into the 15-20 million range. I can let you know if any problems arise.
>
> Dan
>
&g
Is there a known limit to the number of documents that Lucene can handle
efficiently? I'm looking to index around 15 million, 2K docs which contain
7-10 searchable fields. Should I be attempting this with Lucene?
Thanks,
Joel
