I am using
query = searcher.rewrite( query );
and it is throwing java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException .
Am I able to use the searcher rewrite method like this?
Thanks,
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Naber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005
Thank you this helped a lot...
Michael Celona
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2005 11:55 AM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Re: Using the highlighter from the sandbox with a prefix query.
On Feb 21, 2005, at 10:53 AM
What is single handedly the best way to improve search performance? I have
an index in the 2G range stored on the local file system of the searcher.
Under a load test of 5 simultaneous users my average search time is ~4700
ms. Under a load test of 10 simultaneous users my average search time is
or IndexReaders on each search? Caching
your IndexSearchers has a dramatic effect on speed.
David Townsend
-Original Message-
From: Michael Celona [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 February 2005 15:55
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Search Performance
What is single handedly the best way
16:15
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Re: Search Performance
Try a singleton pattern or an static field.
Stefan
Michael Celona wrote:
I am creating new IndexSearchers... how do I cache my IndexSearcher...
Michael
-Original Message-
From: David Townsend [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
made some measurements on caching on my site:
http://www.searchmorph.com/weblog/index.php?id=41
http://www.searchmorph.com/weblog/index.php?id=40
And I use OSCache:
http://www.searchmorph.com/weblog/index.php?id=38
http://www.opensymphony.com/oscache/
Michael Celona wrote:
What is single
Thanks... I am seeing this problem right now Has anyone implemented a
better solution...?
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Chris Lamprecht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 4:14 PM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Re: Search Performance
I should have
Just tried that... works like a charm... thanks...
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 4:42 PM
To: Lucene Users List; Chris Lamprecht
Subject: Re: Search Performance
Or you could just open a new IndexSearcher,
I have varying length text fields which I am searching on. I would like
relevancy to be dictated predominantly by the number of terms in my query
that match. Right now I am seeing a high relevancy for a single word
matching in a small document even though all the terms in my query don't
match.
Would fixing the lengthNorm to 1 fix this problem?
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Michael Celona [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 8:48 AM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Similarity coord,lengthNorm
I have varying length text fields which I am searching on. I
Does any have a working example of the highlighter class found in the
sandbox?
-Original Message-
From: Jason Polites [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 5:34 PM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Re: Search Engine review article/book
Also:
11 matches
Mail list logo
