Hi to all.
Maybe the term frequency is not the only parameter you need to override to
"customize" the score attributed by Lucene.
Maybe you should consider the normalisation factor, the idf and the coord
factor ?
Philippe
From: "Niraj Alok" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Lucene Users List" <[EM
> -- Snip --
> If you can't guaranty a fixed number of Lucene results (and it is often
the > case !), a good way is to duplicate the last PK and so to round to a
fixed
> number.
>
Hi... I'm not sure what you mean by that last bit.
Hi ... i'm going to try to express myself correctly ... in eng
Hi to all.
Just one word about "crossing" Lucene results and DB results. Maybe it is
obvious but maybe not (sorry for my english).
Once you got the Lucene results, a good way is to get the PKs that you have
stored in the Lucene and use then directly in the SQL query with a IN
operator.
In th
Hi.
I had this problem when i transfered a Lucene index by FTP in "ASCII" mode.
Using binary mode, i never has such a problem.
Philippe
From: James Dunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Lucene Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
Date: Mon,
Thanks for your quick answer. I'm going to try the PhraseQuery as you
propose.
But considering theses three examples :
document 1 ="this is an example"
document 2 ="this is an example of document"
document 3 ="this is an other example"
i guess that a PhraseQuery, based on :
+"thi
Hi all.
I'm migrating a part of an application from Oracle intermedia to Lucene
(1.3) to perform full text searches.
I'd like to know if there is a way to perform "exact queries". By "exact
query", i mean beeing able to match ONLY document that are exactely equals
to the terms of the query.
E
