Re: Incremental Search experiment with Lucene, sort of like the new Google Suggestion page

2004-12-12 Thread David Spencer
Chris Lamprecht wrote: Very cool, thanks for posting this! Google's feature doesn't seem to do a search on every keystroke necessarily. Instead, it waits until you haven't typed a character for a short period (I'm guessing about 100 or 150 milliseconds). So Thx again for tip, I updated my

Re: Incremental Search experiment with Lucene, sort of like the new Google Suggestion page

2004-12-11 Thread David Spencer
Chris Lamprecht wrote: Very cool, thanks for posting this! Google's feature doesn't seem to do a search on every keystroke necessarily. Instead, it waits until you haven't typed a character for a short period (I'm guessing about 100 or 150 milliseconds). Ohh, good point - I was wondering how

Re: Incremental Search experiment with Lucene, sort of like the new Google Suggestion page

2004-12-11 Thread Chris Hostetter
: I also realized they're prob not doing searches at all - instead they're : going off a DB of query popularity - I wanted to code up something you are correct, hence the reason cnet banana doesn't appear in the list of suggestions even though it has 41K results, but hossman trophy does (with

Re: Incremental Search experiment with Lucene, sort of like the new Google Suggestion page

2004-12-10 Thread Chris Lamprecht
Very cool, thanks for posting this! Google's feature doesn't seem to do a search on every keystroke necessarily. Instead, it waits until you haven't typed a character for a short period (I'm guessing about 100 or 150 milliseconds). So if you type fast, it doesn't hit the server until you

Incremental Search experiment with Lucene, sort of like the new Google Suggestion page

2004-12-10 Thread David Spencer
Google just came out with a page that gives you feedback as to how many pages will match your query and variations on it: http://www.google.com/webhp?complete=1hl=en I had an unexposed experiment I had done with Lucene a few months ago that this has inspired me to expose - it's not the same,