Re: Lucene : avoiding locking (incremental indexing)

2004-11-16 Thread Sergiu Gordea
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am interested in pursuing experienced peoples' understanding as I have half the queue approach developed already. well I think that experienced people developed lucene :) theyoffered us the possibility to use multithreading and concurent searching. Of course .. depen

Re: Lucene : avoiding locking (incremental indexing)

2004-11-16 Thread jeichels
I am interested in pursuing experienced peoples' understanding as I have half the queue approach developed already. I am not following why you don't like the queue approach Sergiu. From what I gathered from this board, if you do lots of updates, the opening of the WriterIndex is very intensiv

Re: Lucene : avoiding locking (incremental indexing)

2004-11-15 Thread sergiu gordea
AIL PROTECTED]> To: "Lucene Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 5:50 PM Subject: Re: Lucene : avoiding locking (incremental indexing) It really seems like I am not the only person having this issue. So far I am seeing 2 solutions and honestly I d

Re: Lucene : avoiding locking (incremental indexing)

2004-11-15 Thread Luke Shannon
m with large content directories. As I learn more I plan to expand the functionality of my class. Luke S - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Lucene Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 5:50 PM Subject: Re: Lucene : avoiding lo

Re: Lucene : avoiding locking (incremental indexing)

2004-11-15 Thread Luke Francl
On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 16:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > So far I am seeing 2 solutions and honestly I don't love either totally. I > am thinking that without changes to Lucene itself, the best "general" way to > implement this might be to have a queue of changes and have Lucene work off > this

Re: Lucene : avoiding locking (incremental indexing)

2004-11-15 Thread jeichels
pieces of the database rather then the whole database. I think I need to look in the developer archives. JohnE - Original Message - From: Luke Shannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Monday, November 15, 2004 5:14 pm Subject: Re: Lucene : avoiding locking (incremental indexing) >

Re: Lucene : avoiding locking (incremental indexing)

2004-11-15 Thread Luke Shannon
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Lucene Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 5:01 PM Subject: Re: Lucene : avoiding locking (incremental indexing) > This is how I implemented incremental indexing. If anyone sees anything > wrong, please let me know. &

Re: Lucene : avoiding locking (incremental indexing)

2004-11-15 Thread Luke Francl
This is how I implemented incremental indexing. If anyone sees anything wrong, please let me know. Our motivation is similar to John Eichel's. We have a digital asset management system and when users update, delete or create a new asset, they need to see their results immediately. The most import