Re: Concurency in Lucene

2002-10-18 Thread Peter Carlson
This looks like a great addition. Is there a new interface to add document and fields? How do you handle the updating. Does the system require a unique ID per document? Does this handle both RAM and FS Directories? That is what if a RAM Directory is used to search the index, does this solution

RE: Concurency in Lucene

2002-10-17 Thread Scott Ganyo
This sounds like an excellent start and would certainly be useful in a number of scenarios, but it is not quite as generally useful as it could be given its asynchronous nature. Generally expected database behavior is that when a change is committed (and not before) it is immediately viewable in

Re: Concurency in Lucene

2002-10-16 Thread Maurits van Wijland
Hi Kiril, > > I wanted to see how much interest is out there for such a solution and > whether Lucene developers feel that this should be part of Lucene. If there > is enough interest I would like to donate this code to Lucene. I think that this is a very good addition to Lucene. In case th deve

Re: Concurency in Lucene

2002-10-16 Thread petite_abeille
On Thursday, Oct 17, 2002, at 00:44 Europe/Zurich, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > If there > is enough interest I would like to donate this code to Lucene. Please do :-) I ran into exactly the same type of problems and while I seem to have hammered them out I would love to see your take on it. P

RE: Concurency in Lucene

2002-10-16 Thread John Cwikla
I personally would love to see this as part of lucene, or just sent to me :). We are doing much the same thing with lucene and have been running up against the exact problems, especially since we have also created indexes per account for our own users for safety and rebuilding, and run up agains