RE: Googlifying lucene querys

2002-03-02 Thread Halácsy Péter
I think this document is very interesting: http://www7.scu.edu.au/programme/fullpapers/1921/com1921.htm peter > -Original Message- > From: Doug Cutting [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 7:15 PM > To: 'Lucene Users List' > Subject: RE:

RE: Googlifying lucene querys

2002-02-25 Thread Joshua O'Madadhain
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Doug Cutting wrote: > > From: Joshua O'Madadhain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > You cannot, in general, structure a Lucene query such that it > > will yield > > the same document rankings that Google would for that (query, document > > set). The reason for this is that

RE: Googlifying lucene querys

2002-02-25 Thread Doug Cutting
> From: Joshua O'Madadhain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > You cannot, in general, structure a Lucene query such that it > will yield > the same document rankings that Google would for that (query, document > set). The reason for this is that Google employs a scoring > algorithm that > includes

RE: Googlifying lucene querys

2002-02-25 Thread Joshua O'Madadhain
ts:george) +(title:bush^5.0 > url:bush^2.0 contents:bush) +(title:white^5.0 url:white^2.0 > contents:white) +(title:house^5.0 url:house^2.0 contents:house) > > > -Original Message- > From: Ian Lea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2002 8:

RE: Googlifying lucene querys

2002-02-25 Thread Doug Cutting
without boosting, title matches usually come before contents matches. Doug > -Original Message- > From: Spencer, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 10:22 AM > To: Lucene Users List > Subject: RE: Googlifying lucene querys > > > I&#x

RE: Googlifying lucene querys

2002-02-25 Thread Spencer, Dave
h) +(title:white^5.0 url:white^2.0 contents:white) +(title:house^5.0 url:house^2.0 contents:house) -Original Message- From: Ian Lea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2002 8:15 AM To: Lucene Users List Subject: Re: Googlifying lucene querys +george +bush +white +h

RE: Googlifying lucene querys

2002-02-25 Thread Howk, Michael
2002 5:23 PM To: Lucene Users List Subject: Re: Googlifying lucene querys Hi Jari, Lucene is designed as an API with different components broken out so a developer can create the uniqueness required. One part of Lucene is the QueryParser. The QueryParser takes a search string and create a set

Re: Googlifying lucene querys

2002-02-23 Thread Peter Carlson
Hi Jari, Lucene is designed as an API with different components broken out so a developer can create the uniqueness required. One part of Lucene is the QueryParser. The QueryParser takes a search string and create a set of classes based on the current QueryParser.jj implementation and turns it i

RE: Googlifying lucene querys

2002-02-23 Thread Jari Aarniala
> +george +bush +white +house Well, that's pretty obvious even for me :) If you have separate words, just tokenize the string and add a plus in front of each of the words. But what I'm trying to do here is this: Let's say I have a more complicated query, say 'george bush "white

Re: Googlifying lucene querys

2002-02-23 Thread Ian Lea
+george +bush +white +house -- Ian. Jari Aarniala wrote: > > Hello, > > Despite of the confusing subject ;) my question is simple. I'm just > trying out Lucene for the first time and would like to know how one > would go on implementing the search on the index with the same logic > that Googl