PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 8:46 AM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Re: Lucene's scalability
you didn't mention the hit count on the query with 50-60 terms.
just wondering if the time was linear.
- Original Message -
From: Armbrust, Daniel C. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
T
you didn't mention the hit count on the query with 50-60 terms.
just wondering if the time was linear.
- Original Message -
From: Armbrust, Daniel C. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 'Lucene Users List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 6:57 AM
Subjec
may take 5-6 seconds.
I don't have any better performance stats than this currently.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Harpreet S Walia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 7:23 AM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Re: Lucene's scalability
Hi ,
I am also tryi
- Original Message -
From: "Armbrust, Daniel C." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Lucene Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 12:07 AM
Subject: RE: Lucene's scalability
> I currently have an index of ~ 12 million docum
. I would be very happy to find that we did not need to
buy a commercial engine because Lucene could do the job.
Joel
- Original Message -
From: "Armbrust, Daniel C." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Lucene Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, Ap
I currently have an index of ~ 12 million documents, which are each about
that size (but in xml form).
When they are transformed for lucene to index, there are upwards of 50
searchable fields.
The index is about 10 GB right now.
I have not yet had any problems with "pushing the limits" of lucen
