RE: Lucene Speed under diff JVMs

2002-12-06 Thread Jonathan Reichhold
It doesn't surprise me that the IBM JDK is faster indexing. This JVM is better optimized in this case from my experience. I did some serious load testing with various JVM implementation from Sun and IBM and found that the opposite when it came to searching. I.e. Lucene searches were fastest unde

RE: Lucene Speed under diff JVMs

2002-12-06 Thread Armbrust, Daniel C.
Class that was used (attached) And correction, the UnStored field had 1000 words, not 500. -Original Message- From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 10:57 AM To: Lucene Users List Subject: RE: Lucene Speed under diff JVMs Otis doesn't

RE: Lucene Speed under diff JVMs

2002-12-06 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
Otis doesn't mind. --- "Armbrust, Daniel C." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One more bit of info that I should have included: > > The randomly generated documents consisted of 2 fields, one Text with > 3 words, and one UnStored with 500 words. Average word length was 7 > characters. > > If Otis (

RE: Lucene Speed under diff JVMs

2002-12-06 Thread Armbrust, Daniel C.
One more bit of info that I should have included: The randomly generated documents consisted of 2 fields, one Text with 3 words, and one UnStored with 500 words. Average word length was 7 characters. If Otis (he wrote it, I just made a tweak or two) doesn't mind, I'll post the source code. Da

RE: Lucene Speed under diff JVMs

2002-12-06 Thread Armbrust, Daniel C.
To clarify (which means adding the info I should have put in it the first time but missed), the run was of 40,000 documents. The number was an average. Each run was done twice (and the results were identical). And the machine was a dual processor machine, so most OS tasks ran on the idle proce

Re: Lucene Speed under diff JVMs

2002-12-05 Thread Joshua O'Madadhain
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Armbrust, Daniel C. wrote: > I'm using the class that Otis wrote (see message from about 3 weeks ago) > for testing the scalability of lucene (more results on that later) and I > first tried running it under different versions of Java, to see where it > runs the fastest. The c

Re: Lucene Speed under diff JVMs

2002-12-05 Thread Leo Galambos
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Armbrust, Daniel C. wrote: > I'm using the class that Otis wrote (see message from about 3 weeks ago) > for testing the scalability of lucene (more results on that later) and I May I ask you where one can get the source code? I cannot find it in archive. Thank you -g- --