Rasik Pandey wrote:
Hello,
I've been meaning to look into good ways to store token offset
information to allow for very
efficient highlighting and I believe Mark may also be looking
into improving the highlighter via
other means such as temporary ram indexes. Search the archives
t
Rasik Pandey wrote:
Kevin,
http://home.clara.net/markharwood/lucene/highlight.htm
Trying to do hit highlighting. This implementation uses
another
Analyzer to find the positions for the result terms.
This seems that it's very inefficient since lucene already
knows the
frequency
> Several solutions have been proposed. The simplest is to not scan past
> the first 10k or so for snippets unless nothing relevant is found in the
> first 10k. I don't think Mark's highlighter yet does this, but I might
> be mistaken.
>
> > since lucene already knows the
> > frequency and posit
Kevin A. Burton wrote:
I'm playing with this package:
http://home.clara.net/markharwood/lucene/highlight.htm
Trying to do hit highlighting. This implementation uses another
Analyzer to find the positions for the result terms.
This seems that it's very inefficient
Does it just seem inefficient,
I intend to release a new version of the highlighter soon that should (hopefully)
address some of the issues under discussion.
The re-design will be based on the following principles:
* A TokenStream will be passed to the highlighter to provide the source of tokens. The
token stream could be pr
Kevin,
> http://home.clara.net/markharwood/lucene/highlight.htm
>
> Trying to do hit highlighting. This implementation uses
> another
> Analyzer to find the positions for the result terms.
>
> This seems that it's very inefficient since lucene already
> knows the
> frequency and position of giv
Hello,
> I've been meaning to look into good ways to store token offset
> information to allow for very
> efficient highlighting and I believe Mark may also be looking
> into improving the highlighter via
> other means such as temporary ram indexes. Search the archives
> to get a background on som
Kevin A. Burton wrote:
I'm playing with this package:
http://home.clara.net/markharwood/lucene/highlight.htm
Trying to do hit highlighting. This implementation uses another
Analyzer to find the positions for the result terms.
This seems that it's very inefficient since lucene already knows the
Erik Hatcher wrote:
On Mar 30, 2004, at 7:56 PM, Kevin A. Burton wrote:
Trying to do hit highlighting. This implementation uses another
Analyzer to find the positions for the result terms.
This seems that it's very inefficient since lucene already knows the
frequency and position of given term
I agree with you that a highlight package should be available directly
from the lucene website. To offer this much-desired feature, having a
dependency on a personal web site seems a little weird to me. It would
also force the community to support this functionality, which would seem
appropriat
On Mar 30, 2004, at 7:56 PM, Kevin A. Burton wrote:
Trying to do hit highlighting. This implementation uses another
Analyzer to find the positions for the result terms.
This seems that it's very inefficient since lucene already knows the
frequency and position of given terms in the index.
What i
11 matches
Mail list logo
