Hi,
David Spencer a écrit :
Do you plan to add expansion on other Wordnet relationships ?
Hypernyms and hyponyms would be a good start point for thesaurus-like
search, wouldn't it ?
Good point, I hadn't considered this - but how would it work -just
consider these 2 relationships "synonyms" (thus
Pierrick Brihaye wrote:
Hi,
David Spencer a écrit :
One example of expansion with the synonym boost set to 0.9 is the
query "big dog" expands to:
Interesting.
Do you plan to add expansion on other Wordnet relationships ? Hypernyms
and hyponyms would be a good start point for thesaurus-like searc
Hi,
David Spencer a écrit :
One example of expansion with the synonym boost set to 0.9 is the query
"big dog" expands to:
Interesting.
Do you plan to add expansion on other Wordnet relationships ? Hypernyms
and hyponyms would be a good start point for thesaurus-like search,
wouldn't it ?
Howeve
Daniel Naber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wednesday 12 January 2005 01:47, David Spencer wrote:
>
>> Amusingly then, documents with the terms "liberal wienerwurst" match
>> "big dog"! :)
>
> There's something like frequency information in WordNet, it could probably
> be used to ignore the unc
On Wednesday 12 January 2005 01:47, David Spencer wrote:
> Amusingly then, documents with the terms "liberal wienerwurst" match
> "big dog"! :)
There's something like frequency information in WordNet, it could probably
be used to ignore the uncommon meanings.
Regards
Daniel
--
http://www.dan
Erik Hatcher wrote:
On Jan 10, 2005, at 6:54 PM, David Spencer wrote:
Hi...I wrote the WordNet sandbox code - but I'm not sure if I
undertand this thread. Are we saying that it does not work w/ the new
WordNet data, or that code in Eric's book is better/more up to date etc?
I have not tried the
On Jan 10, 2005, at 6:54 PM, David Spencer wrote:
Hi...I wrote the WordNet sandbox code - but I'm not sure if I
undertand this thread. Are we saying that it does not work w/ the new
WordNet data, or that code in Eric's book is better/more up to date
etc?
I have not tried the sandbox with any ver
t;watch" OR "analog watch" OR "digital watch" OR "hunter" OR
"hunting watch" OR "pendulum watch" OR "pocket watch"
Check this Out,may be u will come up with Briliant Idea's
with regards
Karthik
-Original Message-
From: Erik H
MATTED : "watch" OR "analog watch" OR "digital watch" OR "hunter" OR
"hunting watch" OR "pendulum watch" OR "pocket watch"
Check this Out,may be u will come up with Briliant Idea's
with regards
Karthik
-Original Messag
t;
FORMATTED : "watch" OR "analog watch" OR "digital watch" OR "hunter" OR
"hunting watch" OR "pendulum watch" OR "pocket watch"
Check this Out,may be u will come up with Briliant Idea's
with regards
Karthik
-Original M
On Jan 10, 2005, at 5:33 AM, Karthik N S wrote:
If u search Google using '~shoes', It returns hits based on the
Synonym's
[ I know there is a Synonym Wordnet based Lucene Package in the
sandbox
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-lucene-sandbox/
contributions/WordN
et/ ]
Can this
11 matches
Mail list logo
