Frank Morton wrote:
Apologies to all. Worse than RTFM. A post-sorting was being done to
the search results, alphabetizing by name. Doh...
I was going to say that I'm doing exactly what you describe with
weighting one field more than the other and it works just fine.
Still, you've found the probl
List
Subject: Re: boosting challenge
Thanks for the response. Using 4.0 did not work either.
Additionally, I have also tried Field.setBoost(4.0) on the "name"
field. That didn't work either.
Still perplexedI assume people are using boosting with 1.4
successfully.
On Nov 29, 2004, a
> -Original Message-
> From: Frank Morton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 12:49 PM
> To: Lucene Users List
> Subject: Re: boosting challenge
>
> Thanks for the response. Using 4.0 did not work either.
>
> Addi
Thanks for the response. Using 4.0 did not work either.
Additionally, I have also tried Field.setBoost(4.0) on the "name"
field. That didn't work either.
Still perplexedI assume people are using boosting with 1.4
successfully.
On Nov 29, 2004, at 3:36 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Try 4.0 in
Try 4.0 instead of 4. That may be correct syntax (don't have
QueryParser source to check), because the code takes boosts as float
type values.
Otis
--- Frank Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have an index of restaurants with two fields. The "name" of the
> restaurant and a "description".
