AIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lucene Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 6:50 PM
Subject: Re: large index query time
> that's very helpful, thanks to all who replied.
>
> my index is definitely larger than my RAM so i guess the increase in query
>
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lucene Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 5:33 PM
Subject: RE: large index query time
Below are some posts from Doug (circa 2001) that I found very helpful with
regard to understanding Lucene scalability. I am assuming that they are
s
> Below are some posts from Doug (circa 2001) that I found very helpful
> with regard to understanding Lucene scalability. I am assuming that
> they are still generally applicable. You might also find them
> useful.
Indeed! Assuming the information is still valid, could it perhaps be
added to th
to open indexes very often.
- Doug Cutting (10/08/2001)
-Original Message-
From: Dan Quaroni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: October 24, 2003 1:33 PM
To: 'Lucene Users List'
Subject: RE: large index query time
My experience is that the query time (and memory usage) can be aff
My experience is that the query time (and memory usage) can be affected
greatly by booleans that retrieve lots of results.
Are you finding it slow when doing a simple query that should return only a
handful of results, or is it on more complex queries?
-Original Message-
From: Maurice Coy
