option and later if a more optimized solution is
built into lucene I can use that.
Praveen
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Hatcher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lucene Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 3:01 PM
Subject: Re: sorti
On Dec 13, 2004, at 2:22 PM, Praveen Peddi wrote:
If its not added to the release code already, is there any reason for
it being not added.
As noted, there is a performance issue with sorting by tokenized
fields. It would seem far more advisable for you to simply add another
field used for sort
al release branch.
Thanks
Praveen
- Original Message -
From: "Aviran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Lucene Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 11:30 AM
Subject: RE: sorting tokenized field
The patch is very simple.
What i
wanted to try my luck again
:).
Thanks in advance.
Praveen
- Original Message -
From: "Praveen Peddi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lucene Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 3:33 PM
Subject: Re: sorting tokenized field
> Since I a
n what the path does? I am trying to
understand what exactly changed but could not figrue out.
Praveen
- Original Message -
From: "Aviran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Lucene Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 2:30 PM
Sub
10, 2004 13:53 PM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Re: sorting tokenized field
On Dec 10, 2004, at 1:40 PM, Praveen Peddi wrote:
> I read that the tokenised fields cannot be sorted. In order to sort
> tokenized field, either the application has to duplicate field with
> diff name and not
ssage -
From: "Erik Hatcher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lucene Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 1:53 PM
Subject: Re: sorting tokenized field
On Dec 10, 2004, at 1:40 PM, Praveen Peddi wrote:
I read that the tokenised fields cannot be sort
On Dec 10, 2004, at 1:40 PM, Praveen Peddi wrote:
I read that the tokenised fields cannot be sorted. In order to sort
tokenized field, either the application has to duplicate field with
diff name and not tokenize it or come up with something else. But
shouldn't the search engine takecare of this
