Erik Hatcher wrote:
On Feb 7, 2005, at 8:53 AM, Michael Celona wrote:
Would fixing the lengthNorm to 1 fix this problem?
Yes, it would eliminate the length of a field as a factor.
Your best bet is to set up a test harness where you can try out various
tweaks to Similarity, but setting the length
t; Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 6:51 AM
> To: Lucene Users List
> Subject: Re: Similarity coord,lengthNorm
>
>
> On Feb 7, 2005, at 8:53 AM, Michael Celona wrote:
> > Would fixing the lengthNorm to 1 fix this problem?
>
> Yes, it would eliminate t
to
1.0 may be all you need to do, as the coord() takes care of the other
factor you're after.
Erik
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Michael Celona [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 8:48 AM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Similarity coord,lengthNorm
I
Would fixing the lengthNorm to 1 fix this problem?
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Michael Celona [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 8:48 AM
To: Lucene Users List
Subject: Similarity coord,lengthNorm
I have varying length text fields which I am searching on. I
I have varying length text fields which I am searching on. I would like
relevancy to be dictated predominantly by the number of terms in my query
that match. Right now I am seeing a high relevancy for a single word
matching in a small document even though all the terms in my query don't
match. D
