Re: distros (was: lug-bg: ATA Promise RAID nevoli.)

2002-12-12 Thread Alexander Velin
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, George Danchev wrote: > > > > A i Redhat e nai-komersialnia Linux. Vseki poddyrzha Redhat - Oracle > > kazvat "Iskash Oracle pod Linux - REDHAT". > > ako e binary-only mersi sym (ili pone samo s commercial support + debeli > argumenti 4e kym momenta nqma otvoren tolkowa dobyr

Re: distros (was: lug-bg: ATA Promise RAID nevoli.)

2002-12-11 Thread George Danchev
Pyrvo pozhelavam uspeh pri podkarvaneto na tozi ataraid s koito i da e driver...(kazah kakvoto moga i pove4e ne mislq 4e moga da go komentiram). Zasto me rybi ili bode kogato load-vam binary only module kym linux/bsd kernel e vypros na precenka, ostavat edni takiva symneniq razbirash li i tova

Re: distros (was: lug-bg: ATA Promise RAID nevoli.)

2002-12-11 Thread Teodor Georgiev
- Original Message - From: "Georgi Chorbadzhiyski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 3:22 PM Subject: Re: distros (was: lug-bg: ATA Promise RAID nevoli.) > Teodor Georgiev wrote: > > tova pyk koi ti go kaza? A i

Re: distros (was: lug-bg: ATA Promise RAID nevoli.)

2002-12-11 Thread Georgi Chorbadzhiyski
Teodor Georgiev wrote: > tova pyk koi ti go kaza? A i az ne slagam Redhat ei taka, a e silno > customiziran (otkym izbor na paketi). Dosta vremeotnemashto, kato se ima vpredvid che developer instalacia ima nad 800 paketa instalirani. > Az sym rabotil mnogo sys slackware i si priznavam che Redhat