On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 10:59:12AM +0100, Borut Mrak wrote:
> Tle je potem fora, da naspies svoj filter, s katerim ti bo Postfix
> prefiltriral mail... Kot receno...never done it.
No, jaz tudi ne bom. :) Reply-To: je tako ali tako samo za mailing liste
dober in nic drugega.. ;>
David!
---
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 11:04:17AM +0100, David Klasinc wrote:
> Zanima me samo Reply-To: Ostalo mi niti ni pomembno..
Potem se pa igraj s content filteringom...Jaz tega se nisem pocel, tako
da ti na zalost ne morem svetovat.
Tle je potem fora, da naspies svoj filter, s katerim ti bo Postfix
pre
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 08:19:31PM +0100, Borut Mrak wrote:
> Upam, da sem bil v pomoc.
Problem, je to, da imam to ze narejeno.
Envelope popravi, From: popravi...
Reply-To: pa se ne dotakne. To: field tudi ostane tak kot je bil v
originalu.
Zanima me samo Reply-To: Ostalo mi niti ni pomembn
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 03:06:06PM +0100, David Klasinc wrote:
> vse @bla.bla naj zamenja z @you.suck
>
> Kjerkoli v headerju..
Iz man canonical:
...
@domain address
Every address in domain is replaced by address.
This form has the lowest precedence.
...
Banzai!
Se da postfixu dopovedat, da naredi rewrite komplet hederja?
vse @bla.bla naj zamenja z @you.suck
Kjerkoli v headerju..
David!
---
ISDN -- It Still Does Nothing
