On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 11:18:34PM +0200, David Klasinc wrote:
> Lack of imagination nima nic s tem veze... Problem je pretty much useless
> answer... ;)
mislim da naju je oba bofh oznacil kot userja. X-(
> Ko zacnes zlagat kocke eno na drugo, kaj hitro postanejo nestabilne. Rad bi
> bil cimbol
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 12:56:32PM +0200, Jernej Horvat wrote:
> I pitty you. you have a lack od imagination.
Lack of imagination nima nic s tem veze... Problem je pretty much useless
answer... ;)
> > Sicer pa preberi moj originalni mail, kjer sem napisal, da mi tunnel resitve
> > niso vsec...
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 02:21:29PM +0200, David Klasinc wrote:
> > > Hm, ne sem ze povedal, nocem tunnela... Oz, kako potem z Windows boxa potem
> > > uporabljam ta tunnel?
> > portforwarding naredis v odjemalcu (securecrt...)
Bah.
> Prekomplicirano... :)
Bah. You both should read tFM.
sslwrap
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 12:52:41PM +0200, Jernej Horvat wrote:
> > Hm, ne sem ze povedal, nocem tunnela... Oz, kako potem z Windows boxa potem
> > uporabljam ta tunnel?
>
> portforwarding naredis v odjemalcu (securecrt...)
Prekomplicirano... :)
David!
---
Windows 95 - The ultimat
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 12:48:15PM +0200, David Klasinc wrote:
> Oh, excuse my ignorance your highness, since I'm just nobody who doesn't use
> The Great and oh how pretty good, never been better, distro
I pitty you. you have a lack od imagination.
we shall try it this way:
dobi si sslwra
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 12:41:20PM +0200, David Klasinc wrote:
> Hm, ne sem ze povedal, nocem tunnela... Oz, kako potem z Windows boxa potem
> uporabljam ta tunnel?
portforwarding naredis v odjemalcu (securecrt...)
--
tcpdump is your friend
On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 02:54:01PM +0200, j wrote:
> > me generalne izkusnje, stevilo neprespanih ur, etc... ;)
>
> apt-get install sslwrap
>
> vi/joe/jed/cat inetd.conf
>
> hosts.deny
Oh, excuse my ignorance your highness, since I'm just nobody who doesn't use
The Great and oh how pretty go
On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 01:14:54PM +0200, Borut Mrak wrote:
> postfix ima v zadnjih snapshotih (ki so kljub imenu kar stabilni :-)
> podporo za SASL. TLS je zastarela stvar, SASL pa je (baje) novejsa, boljsa,
> itd.
SASL je cisto nekaj drugega kot TLS. SASL je samo authentification, mail se
pot
On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 01:05:51PM +0200, rok wrote:
> freshmeatu. poleg wrapperja rabis se openssl in kljuce. prakticno nardi
> "forward" originalnega porta na ssl port z vmesno kripcijo. lohka nardis
> recimo sftp, stelnet, spop3, ssmtp...
Hm, ne sem ze povedal, nocem tunnela... Oz, kako pote
> Ce je kdo kaj pocel na tem ali je kaka stvar na katero pazit? Tako,
zanimajo
> me generalne izkusnje, stevilo neprespanih ur, etc... ;)
apt-get install sslwrap
vi/joe/jed/cat inetd.conf
hosts.deny
hosts.allow
pop3s: paranoid
imaps: paranoid
pop3:localhost
imap:localhost
On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 12:22:04PM +0200, David Klasinc wrote:
> Je kdo ze postavljal kaj podobnega? Postfix ima patch za TLS smtp, prav
> tako qmail.
postfix ima v zadnjih snapshotih (ki so kljub imenu kar stabilni :-)
podporo za SASL. TLS je zastarela stvar, SASL pa je (baje) novejsa, boljsa,
jst sm to enkrat realiziral preko enega ssl wrapperja ki sem ga nasel na
freshmeatu. poleg wrapperja rabis se openssl in kljuce. prakticno nardi
"forward" originalnega porta na ssl port z vmesno kripcijo. lohka nardis
recimo sftp, stelnet, spop3, ssmtp...
lp, rok.
Banzai!
Je kdo ze postavljal kaj podobnega? Postfix ima patch za TLS smtp, prav
tako qmail.
Bolj me zanima kako je z imap in pop ssl supportom. Tukaj ne mislim na APOP
in podobne verzije pop protokola, ki kriptirajo passworde ampak SSL verzijo
popa, ki ki kriptira cel session.
Tunnel preko SSH
13 matches
Mail list logo
