Re: [ LUGOS ] sig_alarm.o

2001-02-07 Прати разговор David Klasinc
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 02:03:10PM +0100, Borut Mrak wrote: > > /usr/include/linux -> /usr/src/linux/include/linux > > /usr/include/asm -> /usr/src/linux/include/asm > > /usr/src/linux/include/asm -> /usr/src/linux/include/asm-i386 > > Mimogrede, od glibc 2.x naprej (kjer za x ne vem tocno koli

Re: [ LUGOS ] sig_alarm.o

2001-02-05 Прати разговор GM
At 13:58 5.2.2001, you wrote: >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA1 > >On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, GM wrote: > > zdaj pa se je en stos ... zdaj pa nardi ta signal.h skozi in se zatakne pri > > errno.h in javi: > > ./compile error.c > > In file included from /usr/include/errno.

Re: [ LUGOS ] sig_alarm.o

2001-02-05 Прати разговор Borut Mrak
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 01:58:38PM +0100, Leon KUKOVEC wrote: > Si kdaj prebral dokumentacijo o namescanju novega kernela ? Si naredil > simbolicne linke tako kot je treba ? Seveda ne! To je za guruje! ;-] > /usr/include/linux -> /usr/src/linux/include/linux > /usr/include/asm -> /usr/src/linux

Re: [ LUGOS ] sig_alarm.o

2001-02-05 Прати разговор Borut Mrak
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 01:32:16PM +0100, GM wrote: > in vidim da imam problem vsemi novimi paketi ki jih zelim prevesti. Javlja > mi napake in mi ne prevede do konca odkar sem sel iz kernel 2.2.13 v 2.2.16 > pri RH6.2. Ne morem prevesti niti proftpd-ja ... rm -rf /usr/include/linux ln -s /usr/

Re: [ LUGOS ] sig_alarm.o

2001-02-05 Прати разговор Leon KUKOVEC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, GM wrote: > zdaj pa se je en stos ... zdaj pa nardi ta signal.h skozi in se zatakne pri > errno.h in javi: > ./compile error.c > In file included from /usr/include/errno.h:36 > from error.c:1: >

Re: [ LUGOS ] sig_alarm.o

2001-02-05 Прати разговор GM
At 13:21 5.2.2001, you wrote: >At 08:17 5.2.2001, you wrote: >>On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, GM wrote: >> > At 17:27 4.2.2001, you wrote: >> > >probam si nastimat qmail pa mi pri "make setup check" javi napako >> > > >> > >a kdo ve zakaj in ali je ze imel kdo kaj takega ? >> > >ker mi pri ./compile sig_alar

Re: [ LUGOS ] sig_alarm.o

2001-02-05 Прати разговор GM
At 08:17 5.2.2001, you wrote: >On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, GM wrote: > > At 17:27 4.2.2001, you wrote: > > >probam si nastimat qmail pa mi pri "make setup check" javi napako > > > > > >a kdo ve zakaj in ali je ze imel kdo kaj takega ? > > >ker mi pri ./compile sig_alarm.c > > >I file included from /usr/in

Re: [ LUGOS ] sig_alarm.o

2001-02-04 Прати разговор Rok Krulec
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, GM wrote: > At 17:27 4.2.2001, you wrote: > >probam si nastimat qmail pa mi pri "make setup check" javi napako > > > >a kdo ve zakaj in ali je ze imel kdo kaj takega ? > >ker mi pri ./compile sig_alarm.c > >I file included from /usr/include/signal.h:300, > > fro

Re: [ LUGOS ] sig_alarm.o

2001-02-04 Прати разговор GM
At 17:27 4.2.2001, you wrote: >Oj, > >probam si nastimat qmail pa mi pri "make setup check" javi napako > >a kdo ve zakaj in ali je ze imel kdo kaj takega ? >ker mi pri ./compile sig_alarm.c >I file included from /usr/include/signal.h:300, > from sig_alarm.c:1: > /usr/include/bit

[ LUGOS ] sig_alarm.o

2001-02-04 Прати разговор GM
Oj, probam si nastimat qmail pa mi pri "make setup check" javi napako a kdo ve zakaj in ali je ze imel kdo kaj takega ? ker mi pri ./compile sig_alarm.c I file included from /usr/include/signal.h:300, from sig_alarm.c:1: /usr/include/bits/sigcontext.h:28: asm:sigcontext.h: No