Further to this, I was able to get
e2fsprogs-1.40.7.sun3-0redhat.src.rpm to rebuild by changing the order
in which the libraries are built.
In Makefile.in I changed LIB_SUBDIRS from...
LIB_SUBDIRS=lib/et lib/ss lib/e2p lib/ext2fs lib/uuid lib/blkid intl
To...
LIB_SUBDIRS=lib/et lib
> 1.6.5.1 is in QA right now to solve this issue as well as include a few
> other minor bugfixes.
Excellent! This is a mutually beneficial change that will help make
lustre reliably infiniband compatible. I know a lot of people are
looking forward to it.
-jeff
>
> b.
>
>
>
On Friday 20 June 2008 16:08:23 Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 16:01 +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> > We do it for several lustre installations and it works fine.
>
> Have you done any "intensive" failover testing of it? I'm thinking
> something along the lines of our Hendrix/CMD
On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 16:01 +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote:
>
> We do it for several lustre installations and it works fine.
Have you done any "intensive" failover testing of it? I'm thinking
something along the lines of our Hendrix/CMD test 11 or 17. In those
tests we had to survive a constant st
On Friday 20 June 2008 15:54:20 Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 16:00 +0200, Heiko Schroeter wrote:
> > What would be the proper setup scenario if the above is not possible ?
> > (Avoiding a single point of failure for the MDS)
>
> Two MDSes each with access to the same storage (the
On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 16:00 +0200, Heiko Schroeter wrote:
>
> What would be the proper setup scenario if the above is not possible ?
> (Avoiding a single point of failure for the MDS)
Two MDSes each with access to the same storage (the MDT) device so that
either (but never both at the same time!
On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 12:47 -0500, Greenseid, Joseph M. wrote:
> Is there any word on where we can get the 1.6.5 kernel-ib package? I
> still haven't been able to find it anywhere on the download site.
1.6.5.1 which is in QA will correct this.
b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitall
On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 16:14 -0700, Kilian CAVALOTTI wrote:
> On Monday 16 June 2008 04:35:41 am Greenseid, Joseph M. wrote:
> > Is there any word on when the IB packages might be making it up to
> > the download site for 1.6.5? As had been previously noted, they were
> > missing when the rest of 1
