On Sat, 2008-09-27 at 12:02 -0500, Mike Feuerstein wrote:
> This sounds elegant, but is it persistent?
lfs setstripe is always persistent.
b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Lustre-discuss mailing list
Lustre-
On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 11:48 -0400, Mag Gam wrote:
> We have been using 1.6 Beta6 version for our clients about 2 months
> but I am curious if there is a newer beta version. I am more concerned
> about the statahead problem and if it was resolved in any newer
> versions.
We don't do public betas --
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 01:42 +0200, Nico Budewitz wrote:
> It's not clear to me which informations/configurations are stored by
> the MGS.
All of the configuration information related to all filesystems that use
that MGS.
> I have two MDT's created on the MDS with the command
>
> 1. with MGS
>
Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> This is _exactly_ the reason that we recommend a separate MGS for
> installations that have even a notion of wanting more than one
> filesystem.
>
I just checked, and the current Lustre operations manual (v1.14, updated
September 19) does not seem to reflect that belie
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 10:34 -0400, Jeff Darcy wrote:
>
> I just checked, and the current Lustre operations manual (v1.14, updated
> September 19) does not seem to reflect that belief; even the "more
> complex configurations" offer mkfs.lustre commands that give a combined
> MGS/MDT.
But you
Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> But you will notice that in the specific section 4.2.2.6 "Running
> Multiple Lustre Filesystems" they do demonstrate setting up a separate
> MGS:
>
Actually they demonstrate setting up a separate MDT to use an existing
MGS. There's even a note that says "specify --mdt
Greetings,
It's Monday (sigh). I lost one dual-core Opteron 275 of two on my OSS
box over the weekend. The /var/log/messages contained many "bus error
on processor" messages. So Monday I rebooted the OSS with only one
dual core CPU. The box came up just fine and I mounted the three
lustre OST
On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 11:28 -0400, Jeff Darcy wrote:
>
> Actually they demonstrate setting up a separate MDT to use an existing
> MGS.
Are we talking about the same thing here? In the commands:
mgsnode# mkfs.lustre --mgs /dev/sda
mdtfoonode# mkfs.lustre --fsname=foo --mdt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greetings folks,
Trying to get Lustre up and running on a RHEL 4 WS box.
Thanks to this list I found the correct link to the e2fsprogs which I
installed.
On booting the lustre enabled kernel, I get a kernel panic.
File Descriptor 3 left open
mount: error 6 mounting ext 3
Mount: error 2 mounting
Mag Gam wrote:
> Thanks Andreas. We are planning to implement 250GB per user. Do you
> think there will be a performance degration?
>
We put a requirement on our integrator to ensure that measured performance
was with quotas turned on. We have seen enough other filesystems were
the performance p
I have a small Luster setup that's worked pretty well for the last year. A few
weeks ago I posted that the OSS locks when it mounts a paticular OST. The
Dilger Procedure was suggested and mounting with "-o abort_recovery" worked.
This morning it crashed again and remounting the same OST and o
11 matches
Mail list logo
