Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre support contract?

2009-05-26 Thread Gregory Matthews
Adeyemi Adesanya wrote: Does anyone know if Sun offer support agreements for Lustre? We would consider paying for up-to-date RHEL5 patched kernel builds and RPMs. I tried to get information on Lustre support from Sun and having rung many different numbers and been passed between many

Re: [Lustre-discuss] lnet_try_match_md()) Matching packet from 12345-10.5.203....@tcp, match 19154486 length 728 too big

2009-05-26 Thread Isaac Huang
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 09:18:43PM +0400, Alexey Lyashkov wrote: Hi Michael, On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 16:38 -0400, Michael D. Seymour wrote: Hi all, One client running CentOS 5.2 re-exports the Lustre filesystem via NFS on a different network. We get the following messages on a

Re: [Lustre-discuss] gridftp and Lustre

2009-05-26 Thread Yujun Wu
Hello Andreas, Thanks for your e-mail. I think what Jeffrey recommends is this: http://www.globus.org/toolkit/docs/4.2/4.2.0/data/gridftp/developer/gridftp-developer-dsi.html As the frontend and backend are separated, the security risk is not big. On the other hand, I have another question: if

[Lustre-discuss] parity raid on MDTs

2009-05-26 Thread John White
Hey Folks, So we've got an interesting question. We're looking at various MDT solutions for a small (120TB) filesystem. We recently have been testing out some Intel X25-Es and are getting mind-blowing performance out of them and think they'd be perfectly positioned for an MDT. We

Re: [Lustre-discuss] lnet_try_match_md()) Matching packet from 12345-10.5.203....@tcp, match 19154486 length 728 too big

2009-05-26 Thread Alexey Lyashkov
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 14:42 -0400, Isaac Huang wrote: On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 09:18:43PM +0400, Alexey Lyashkov wrote: Hi Michael, On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 16:38 -0400, Michael D. Seymour wrote: Hi all, One client running CentOS 5.2 re-exports the Lustre filesystem via NFS on

Re: [Lustre-discuss] gridftp and Lustre

2009-05-26 Thread Andreas Dilger
On May 26, 2009 12:44 -0700, Jeffrey Bennett wrote: Is it technically possible to implement this without using the Lustre client on the OSS and accessing directly to the objects on the OSS? I guess this would imply the development of some sort of Lustre Client/Gridftp server all together in