Re: [Lustre-discuss] OST went back in time to 0 (bug 9646)

2009-07-31 Thread Andreas Dilger
On Jul 30, 2009 08:29 +0200, Jakob Goldbach wrote: > I have a question on bug 9646 - Server went back in time. > > I had an OSS crash and had to pull the power. After mounting lustre > again I see the following on one of my clients: > > (import.c:909:ptlrpc_connect_interpret()) b-OST0010_UUID we

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre and iSCSI

2009-07-31 Thread Cliff White
David Pratt wrote: > Hi. I am exploring possibilities for pooled storage for virtual > machines. Lustre looks quite interesting for both tolerance and speed. I > have a couple of basic questions: > > 1) Can Lustre present an iSCSI target Lustre doesn't present target, we use targets, and we sho

[Lustre-discuss] LBUG encountered in 1.8.0

2009-07-31 Thread Daniel Kulinski
Unmounting lustre when our heartbeat software was misconfigured (IPMI password changed). tx1oss3-clusternet kernel: LustreError: 19350:0:(quota_context.c:1369:lqs_exit()) ASSERTION(atomic_read(&q->lqs_refcount) == 0) failed:Busy lqs 8101e2e7c880 with 14 refs Message from syslogd@ at Fri

[Lustre-discuss] Lustre and iSCSI

2009-07-31 Thread David Pratt
Hi. I am exploring possibilities for pooled storage for virtual machines. Lustre looks quite interesting for both tolerance and speed. I have a couple of basic questions: 1) Can Lustre present an iSCSI target 2) I am looking at physical machines with 4 1TB 24x7 drives in each. How many mach