On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 03:39:52PM +0200, Wolfgang Stief wrote:
> Hi out there!
>
> Before I start installing and fiddling around: Are there any reasons
> AGAINST setting up a Lustre playground in a VirtualBox environment? I
> just want to play around w/ recovery and debugging situations and
> upg
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 12:01 -0600, Kevin Van Maren wrote:
> I think the issues is this is all that is listed:
>
> Base Linux Kernel Source - unpatched (installable RPM)
> kernel-2.6.18-128.1.14.el5.src.rpm
>
> Where is the version with the Lustre patches?
The Lustre patch is in the RPM along wi
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 03:56:13PM +0800, Lee Amy wrote:
> ..
> It seems this method cannot solve my problem. My NID is
> 10.0.38@tcp, and furthermore when I add the item
>
> options lnet network=tcp0(eth1)
>
> I still encountered the same problem and after this failure I change
> this it
I think the issues is this is all that is listed:
Base Linux Kernel Source - unpatched (installable RPM)
kernel-2.6.18-128.1.14.el5.src.rpm
Where is the version with the Lustre patches?
Kevin
Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 15:08 +1000, Richard Smith wrote:
>
>> I downloade
If you serve 3 req/s, you will likely need a distributed in-memory cache.
Things like Terracotta or Coherence may work well for your dataset (500 GB),
although I haven't used either.
-Tao
From: lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org
[mailto:lustre-discu
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 15:08 +1000, Richard Smith wrote:
> I downloaded Lustre 1.8.1 today, but didn't see any kernel-source rpm.
Which distro?
> There were a few new src.rpm packages whose equivalent wasn't in 1.8.0.1.
Right. Starting with 1.8.1, we are packaging our kernels just like the
vendo
One more notice ...
I have created OSS/MDS on SuSE 11 (1.8.1) and tried to access it from SuSE 10
(1.8.0).
I can reach required bandwidth (~46.8 MB/s) !!!
If I have not done any mistake, seems to be SuSE 11 Lustre (1.8.1) Client does
not perform well with SuSE 10 Lustre (1.8.0) MDS/OSS.
Could
Do you have any idea about following error ... ? I can see this on both MDS and
OSS ...?
I tried to Google this, but could not find anything interesting ?
LustreError: 3039:0:(socklnd_cb.c:2228:ksocknal_recv_hello()) Unknown protocol
version (2.x expected) from 172.25.88.202
172.25.88.202
there is only one NIC in each machine. Does lustre need more than one nic in
each machine ?
suse11-202:~ # ifconfig
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:14:4F:EB:47:8C
inet addr:172.25.88.202 Bcast:172.25.88.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1
How many NICs do you have on your client, MDS, OSS?
I am suspecting its a routing issue. Do you have more than 1 NIC on
all of these boxes?
options lnet 'networks="tcp0(eth0,eth1),elan0"'
I advise you to take a look at 5.1.1 in the Lustre manual,
manual.lustre.org/images/4/48/LustreManual_1.6_ma
I can SCP from/to client machine at 50 MB/s rate.
Interface is up at 1000Full.
No packet loss.
Just like to emphasize ... Client is SuSE 11 (1.8.1) and OSS/MDS are SuSE 10
(1.8.0)
suse11-202:~ # scp SLES-11-DVD-x86_64-GM-DVD1.iso 172.25.88.220:
Password:
SLES-11-DVD-x86_64-GM-DVD1.iso
Since we have been using lustre for a while now we would like to port
some of them to use I/O features of lustre. Currently, all of the
applications are very memory intensive, meaning they take in the
entire dataset at 1 time load it into memory (64GB) and process. I was
wondering if there are some
Is your network setup properly? Can you scp/ftp file to your OSS as a
test? Check if your network interfaces are properly connected
(autoneg, 1000Full). make sure you aren't getting any packet loss
(netstat -i). Also First then that and see how it goes.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 3:37 AM, Tharindu R
hi All,
I have following lustre installation.
Node A : OSS (SuSE 10) - 1.8.0
Node B : MDS (SuSE 10) - 1.8.0
Node C: Client (SuSE 11) - 1.8.1
When try to run "dd" command on lustre mount, it is only writing at 2.1 MB/s
But If mount same file system on Node B, I can achive 45 MB/s
Jim:
Mag just started a good thread about a live back up. Depending on your budget
if the spare boxes are available and enough disks just make another Lustre
filesystem and copy the existing data over with smb. Here is a screenshot of
my commodity hardware rig-up of a 5.4 TB raid10 Lustre Fil
15 matches
Mail list logo
