Thanks, Andreas.
Indeed we are running Lustre 1.6.7.2, on kernel 2.6.22, Debian Etch. But there
was no upgrade
involved, we moved from 1.6.7.1 to .2 in July.
The procedure you described has the slight disadvantage of having to take the
OSTs in question
offline. It would be nice if Robinhood did
if I were to deploy a system now and I want to do the kernel compile
way, what kernel do you recommend? I prefer using 1.6.7.2 because of
its stability...
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On 2009-10-29, at 06:49, Ramiro Alba Queipo wrote:
>> I am using (now testing) lust
On Saturday 31 October 2009, Mag Gam wrote:
> if I were to deploy a system now and I want to do the kernel compile
> way, what kernel do you recommend? I prefer using 1.6.7.2 because of
> its stability...
Sun is very helpful and provide distribution kernels as tar.bz2 on
their download page:
htt
On 2009-10-31, at 11:37, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> Sun is very helpful and provide distribution kernels as tar.bz2 on
> their download page:
>
> http://downloads.lustre.org/public/kernels/
>
> So instead of going through the pain to get that yourself from the
> vendors src.rpm Sun already greatly hel
