Hi all,
We are pleased to announce that Lustre 2.0 Alpha7 is available for download.
This is our next step in a series of milestone based pre-releases as we move
towards Lustre 2.0 GA. This alpha includes 125 fixes since the Alpha 6
milestone.
Alpha Milestone Criteria:
* Tested for RHEL5/OEL
Jagga,
I think this is more a function of scp than than ib in general. Have
you tried using the HPN-SSH patches?
http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/
You could also try using apache to serve the iso over HTTP to see if
SCP is the bottleneck.
Also I think IPoIB should be able to use a mu
On 2010-02-10, at 17:29, David Simas wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 02:41:55PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
>>
>> - primarily, the upstream e2fsprogs does not yet have full support
>> for
>> > 16TB filesystems, and while experimental patches exist there
>> are still
>> bugs being found oc
Hi Guys,
I have setup a new cluster with a infiniband interconnect and I am a bit
confused with the performance I am getting as far as transfer rates. Is
there something that I am missing here? Shouldn't the transfer rate over
the ib interface be much faster and not the same compared with the 1G
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 02:41:55PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On 2010-02-10, at 07:39, Roger Spellman wrote:
> > Thank you. Based on the kernel version string, we had assumed that
> > SLES
> > was closer to the latest kernel.org release than RHEL. That appears
> > not
> > to be the case.
On 2010-02-10, at 07:39, Roger Spellman wrote:
> Thank you. Based on the kernel version string, we had assumed that
> SLES
> was closer to the latest kernel.org release than RHEL. That appears
> not
> to be the case.
>
> Just curious, why the limit is now 16T? This works nicely for 2T
> dr
On Tuesday 09 February 2010, Roger Spellman wrote:
> I see that 1.8.2 supports 16T OSTs for RHEL.
A bit OT (doesn't relate specifically to sles) but relates to 16T support.
We currently have 1T drives in 10+2 configuration yielding 10 TB arrays. Today
we have to split this into two logical parts
Ulrich Sibiller schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> we are experiencing some weird behaviour on one of our Lustre clients.
>
> First some information about our environment:
> - Lustre 1.8.1.1 CentOS52 (Kernel 2.6.18-92.1.13.el5)
> - self-compiled patchless clients with quotas enabled (quotas not used at the
> mo
