On 2010-03-17, at 02:59, Gregory Matthews wrote:
> Well, I'm no expert at reading the the kernel bugzilla but...
>
> Gregory Matthews wrote:
>> BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [] code:
>> modprobe/6024
>> caller is set_ptldebug_header+0x41/0xa0 [libcfs]
>> Pid: 6024, comm: mo
SRIVATSA N D wrote:
> I have installed lustre 1.8 on centOS successfully. The centOS is in
> vmWare.
> The lustre kernel boots properly. But when I type the following in the
> terminal :
>
> *mkfs.lustre --fsname=temp --mdt --mgs /dev/loop0*
> *
> *
> It gives an error saying:
>
> *bash: mkfs.lust
I have installed lustre 1.8 on centOS successfully. The centOS is in vmWare.
The lustre kernel boots properly. But when I type the following in the
terminal :
*mkfs.lustre --fsname=temp --mdt --mgs /dev/loop0*
*
*
It gives an error saying:
*bash: mkfs.lustre command not found*
but... when i type
On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 11:40:48 +0100
Isaac Hailperin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> does anybody have any experience with quotas on luste (1.6.6)? Is
> there any impact on stability and/or performance?
>
> Cheers,
> Isaac
> ___
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-d
Well, I'm no expert at reading the the kernel bugzilla but...
Gregory Matthews wrote:
> BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [] code: modprobe/6024
> caller is set_ptldebug_header+0x41/0xa0 [libcfs]
> Pid: 6024, comm: modprobe Not tainted 2.6.27.39-default #2
>
> Call Trace:
> [
