Re: [Lustre-discuss] Help with a question about lustre_rsync in Lustre 2.0 Beta1

2010-05-27 Thread Nathan Rutman
No. This tool is intended to keep an entire (big) FS synched; if all you need is a subdir you should use regular (not lustre-) rsync. (I can't think of any reason why that functionality couldn't be added, but it's not entirely trivial.) On May 19, 2010, at 8:32 AM, Yujun Wu wrote: > Hello, > >

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Monitoring filesystem usage

2010-05-27 Thread Jason Rappleye
http://robinhood.sourceforge.net/ Would probably be a good start. ne2scan, described here http://wiki.lustre.org/images/d/df/Cardo_LUG2010.pdf might fit the bill as well. I don't know if the code has been released yet, though. Jason On May 27, 2010, at 11:26 AM, David Noriega wrote: > What

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre and Automount

2010-05-27 Thread Fraser McCrossan
David Simas wrote: On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:50:15PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote: There have been some reports of problems with automount and Lustre that have never been tracked down. If someone with automount experience and config, and time to track this down could investigate I'm sur

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre and Automount

2010-05-27 Thread Bernd Schubert
On Thursday 27 May 2010, David Simas wrote: > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:50:15PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote: > > There have been some reports of problems with automount and Lustre > > that have never been tracked down. If someone with automount > > experience and config, and time to track this do

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre and Automount

2010-05-27 Thread David Simas
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:50:15PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote: > There have been some reports of problems with automount and Lustre > that have never been tracked down. If someone with automount > experience and config, and time to track this down could investigate > I'm sure we could work

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre and Automount

2010-05-27 Thread Andreas Dilger
There have been some reports of problems with automount and Lustre that have never been tracked down. If someone with automount experience and config, and time to track this down could investigate I'm sure we could work it out. Cheers, Andreas On 2010-05-27, at 12:24, David Noriega wrote:

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre and Automount

2010-05-27 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 13:24 -0500, David Noriega wrote: > We are pre-Lustre right now and have some questions. Currently our > cluster uses LDAP+automount to mount user's home directories from our > file server. Once we go Lustre, is there any sort of modification to > LDAP or automount(besides th

[Lustre-discuss] Monitoring filesystem usage

2010-05-27 Thread David Noriega
What tools do you use to keep track of who is using and how much of the filesystem? Are there any free tools to keep track of old files, temp files, large files, etc? Basically how to you keep things running in an orderly fashion and keep users in line, besides adding more space? -- Personally, I

[Lustre-discuss] Lustre and Automount

2010-05-27 Thread David Noriega
We are pre-Lustre right now and have some questions. Currently our cluster uses LDAP+automount to mount user's home directories from our file server. Once we go Lustre, is there any sort of modification to LDAP or automount(besides the installation of the Lustre client programs) needed? -- Person

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre client mount

2010-05-27 Thread Kevin Van Maren
Brian J. Murrell wrote: > On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 19:18 +0400, Sergey Arlashin wrote: > >> Hi! >> I have a Lustre storage named "storage" and usually I mount it with >> command: >> mount -t lustre 192.168.15.241:/storage /mnt/lustrefs >> I wonder if it is possible to mount only a particular folde

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Lustre client mount

2010-05-27 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 19:18 +0400, Sergey Arlashin wrote: > Hi! > I have a Lustre storage named "storage" and usually I mount it with > command: > mount -t lustre 192.168.15.241:/storage /mnt/lustrefs > I wonder if it is possible to mount only a particular folder from the > Lustre storage? No. T

[Lustre-discuss] Lustre client mount

2010-05-27 Thread Sergey Arlashin
Hi! I have a Lustre storage named "storage" and usually I mount it with command: mount -t lustre 192.168.15.241:/storage /mnt/lustrefs I wonder if it is possible to mount only a particular folder from the Lustre storage? Like nfs? I mean.. for example.. I have a folder named "folder1" and I want t

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Future of lustre 1.8.3+

2010-05-27 Thread Bernd Schubert
On Wednesday 26 May 2010, Guy Coates wrote: > On 26/05/10 17:25, Ramiro Alba Queipo wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 16:48 +0100, Guy Coates wrote: > One thing to watch out for in your kernel configs is to make sure > that: > > CONFIG_SECURITY_FILE_CAPABILITIES=N > >>> > >>> OK.

[Lustre-discuss] Future of lustre 1.8.3+

2010-05-27 Thread Heiko Schröter
Hello, does the following procedure "look" right installing a patched kernel src (i.e. SLES11) and lustre 1.8.3 plus the e2fsprogs.sun2 ? a) Unpack i.e. SLES 11 Kernel src. (I don't know for sure if the links are really needed, because the Kernel is allready patched.) cd SLES11kernelDir ln -s

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Future of lustre 1.8.3+

2010-05-27 Thread Heiko Schröter
Am Donnerstag 27 Mai 2010, um 09:12:50 schrieben Sie: Thanks very much, Girish ! Regards Heiko > On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 14:01 +0200, Heiko Schröter wrote: > > > I know. But the patches are missing for 1.41.10 in that repo. i.e. as this > > here "e2fsprogs-1.41.6.sun1-patches.tgz" > Please find

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Future of lustre 1.8.3+

2010-05-27 Thread Girish Shilamkar
On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 14:01 +0200, Heiko Schröter wrote: > I know. But the patches are missing for 1.41.10 in that repo. i.e. as this > here "e2fsprogs-1.41.6.sun1-patches.tgz" Please find the patches at http://downloads.lustre.org/public/tools/e2fsprogs/1.41.10.sun2/e2fsprogs-1.41.10.sun2-patche