Re: [Lustre-discuss] LBUG with 1.8.2 during rm

2010-07-15 Thread Peter Jones
Yes, confirmed. Every site that reported this issue reported it resolved with this patch. Andreas Dilger wrote: snip The patch shows in bugzilla as landed-1.8.3, and the 1.8.3 ChangeLog also lists a fix for bug 22177, so I'd say it is fixed.

Re: [Lustre-discuss] NFS Export Issues

2010-07-15 Thread William Olson
Somebody, anybody? I'm sure it's something fairly simple, but it escapes me, assistance would be greatly appreciated! Thanks Again! Hello All, Having trouble exporting a lustre mount with NFS.. When mounting the NFS export on client: [r...@nfsclient /]# mount

Re: [Lustre-discuss] 1.6.6 to 1.8.3 upgrade, OSS with wrong Target value

2010-07-15 Thread Roger Sersted
OK. This looks bad. It appears that I should have upgraded ext3 to ext4, I found instructions for that, tune2fs -O extents,uninit_bg,dir_index /dev/XXX fsck -pf /dev/XXX Is the above correct? I'd like to move our systems to ext4. I didn't know those steps were

Re: [Lustre-discuss] 1.6.6 to 1.8.3 upgrade, OSS with wrong Target value

2010-07-15 Thread Wojciech Turek
can you also please post output of 'rpm -qa | grep lustre' run on puppy5-7 ? On 15 July 2010 15:55, Roger Sersted r...@aps.anl.gov wrote: OK. This looks bad. It appears that I should have upgraded ext3 to ext4, I found instructions for that, tune2fs -O extents,uninit_bg,dir_index

Re: [Lustre-discuss] Optimize parallel compilation on lustre

2010-07-15 Thread Maxence Dunnewind
Heya, I just tried your patch, which is not working very well :D If I am on one node, the results are a bit better (8min30 against 9min07), but as soon as I compile in // on more than one node, I get many compilation errors. Regards, Maxence -- Maxence DUNNEWIND Contact :

Re: [Lustre-discuss] 1.6.6 to 1.8.3 upgrade, OSS with wrong Target value

2010-07-15 Thread Roger Sersted
Wojciech Turek wrote: can you also please post output of 'rpm -qa | grep lustre' run on puppy5-7 ? [r...@puppy5 log]# rpm -qa |grep -i lustre kernel-2.6.18-164.11.1.el5_lustre.1.8.3 lustre-1.8.3-2.6.18_164.11.1.el5_lustre.1.8.3 lustre-ldiskfs-3.0.9-2.6.18_164.11.1.el5_lustre.1.8.3

Re: [Lustre-discuss] 1.6.6 to 1.8.3 upgrade, OSS with wrong Target value

2010-07-15 Thread Roger Sersted
I greatly appreciate the time and effort you've taken. It is difficult to diagnose and support sophisticated systems via an email exchange. Unfortunately, I am under time constraints to get this system usable. Therefore, I have started reformatting the MDS and OSSes. Roger S.

Re: [Lustre-discuss] 1.6.6 to 1.8.3 upgrade, OSS with wrong Target value

2010-07-15 Thread Wojciech Turek
Hi Roger Where did you find this CONFIG hack? Did you make a copy of the CONFIG dir before followed this steps? On 15 July 2010 20:02, Roger Sersted r...@aps.anl.gov wrote: I am using the ext4 RPMs. I ran the following commands on the MDS and OSS nodes (lustre was not running at the

Re: [Lustre-discuss] 1.6.6 to 1.8.3 upgrade, OSS with wrong Target value

2010-07-15 Thread Wojciech Turek
No problem , sorry I could help better, unfortunatelly the time I can spend on the list is currently very limited. Could you please point me to the place where you found this CONFIG hack as I would like to find out at what context were those steps recommended? Best regards, Wojciech On 15 July

Re: [Lustre-discuss] short writes

2010-07-15 Thread Christopher J. Morrone
On 07/08/2010 04:51 PM, John Hammond wrote: How about a network file system waiting for server failover (especially if it is not automatic)? That's not indefinite. The FS is waiting for something which will eventually occur. (Assuming it's is correctly administered). That IS indefinite.

Re: [Lustre-discuss] NFS Export Issues

2010-07-15 Thread Andreas Dilger
On 2010-07-15, at 08:33, William Olson wrote: Somebody, anybody? I'm sure it's something fairly simple, but it escapes me, assistance would be greatly appreciated! I can't comment, since my NFS re-exporting (to a MacOS client) is working fine. Hopefully soon I can stop doing that and use