It appears that turning off statahead does indeed avoid the soft lockup bug.
But this seems to me to be a workaround, and not a solution.
Is statahead not useful for performance gains? I am not comfortable making my
user's jobs waste more cpu time because I have to implement a workaround
On 9/20/10 5:36 PM, Temple Jason wrote:
It appears that turning off statahead does indeed avoid the soft lockup bug.
But this seems to me to be a workaround, and not a solution.
Is statahead not useful for performance gains? I am not comfortable making
my user's jobs waste more cpu time
Yes, turning off statahead is a workaround. Of course it is a trade-off
and ultimately for you to decide. However, the statahead feature
(introduced in 1.6.2 I think) has been very problematic and many
previous attempts at fixing issues have caused subtle regressions. Most
sites seem to be
Bernd Schubert wrote:
Hello Cory,
On 09/17/2010 11:31 PM, Cory Spitz wrote:
Hi, Bernd.
On 09/17/2010 02:48 PM, Bernd Schubert wrote:
On Friday, September 17, 2010, Andreas Dilger wrote:
On 2010-09-17, at 12:42, Jonathan B. Horen wrote:
We're trying to architect
