> 2) Make sure caching is enabled on the oss.
How do you check/enable for this? Is it not enabled by default?
Cheers, Mark
- Original Message -
From: "Mohr Jr, Richard Frank (Rick Mohr)"
To: "Grigory Shamov"
Cc: lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
Sent: Saturday, 8 December, 2012 5:
On Dec 6, 2012, at 2:58 PM, Grigory Shamov wrote:
> So, on one of our OSS servers the load is now 160. According to collectl,
> only one OST does most of the job. (We dont do striping on this FS; unless
> users to it manually on their subdirectories).
This sounds similar to situations we see ev
On 12/7/12 9:34 AM, Dilger, Andreas wrote:
> I've been using Lustre for years with my home MythTV (Linux PVR) setup.
Nerd. :)
--
--
Jeff Johnson
Co-Founder
Aeon Computing
jeff.john...@aeoncomputing.com
www.aeoncomputing.com
t: 858-412-3810 x101 f: 858-412-3845
m: 61
It is the question of how to handle redundancy that stops me from
immediately testing this idea of mine. Well, that and time, werewithal,
etc...
Hadoop is great because it uses the speed and latency of local disks to
work with data, and does not require systems be homogeneous. With the
data repl
I have used fuse for other filesystems: its great if all you need is access to
the data, but the performance is HORRIBLE.
--jason
From: Jon Yeargers mailto:yearg...@ohsu.edu>>
Date: Friday, December 7, 2012 9:42 AM
To: Jason Brooks mailto:brook...@ohsu.edu>>,
"lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
If it weren’t for the positive aspects of HDFS I wouldn’t really be considering
HBase (over Cassandra).
Any notion of the merits of Lustre’s kernel-based mounts vs a FUSE-based mount
(HDFS)? Whichever filesystem I go with I will need to store ‘flat files’ in.
From: Jason Brooks
Sent: Friday, De
Hello,
The question of hdfs storage via lustre has been in the foreground of my
thinking. the hadoop hdfs processes are not aware of block devices: they only
know of a filesystem mount point to begin storing data in hdfs. THUS…
If we provide a filesystem interface (say a lustre mount point) w
The redundancy of HDFS is very appealing. I've been weighing the merits of this
vs a RAID-6 / server on Lustre. HDFS recommends avoiding RAID for the very
reason that the data is (typically) saved in several locations.
-Original Message-
From: Dilger, Andreas [mailto:andreas.dil...@inte
On 2012-12-07, at 10:26, Jon Yeargers
mailto:yearg...@ohsu.edu>> wrote:
Can Lustre be used to store data like streaming audio / video? I’ve been
scolded about considering it for DB storage but I’m looking at the relative
merits of Lustre vs HDFS.
I've been using Lustre for years with my home My
Hi,
On 12/07/2012 10:26 AM, Jon Yeargers wrote:
>
> Can Lustre be used to store data like streaming audio / video?
>
Yes
> I’ve been scolded about considering it for DB storage but I’m looking
> at the relative merits of Lustre vs HDFS.
>
db reads/writes tends to lead to small I/O which lustre d
Can Lustre be used to store data like streaming audio / video? I’ve been
scolded about considering it for DB storage but I’m looking at the relative
merits of Lustre vs HDFS.
I’m moving to a clustered DB setup and wondering about Cassandra / Lustre vs
Hadoop (IE HBase / HDFS). One offers flexib
Just a reminder that we have a meeting on Tuesday to discuss the new test
framework development and that the wiki page on the opensfs site is ready
for capturing everybody's thoughts. The plan for the next meeting to be to
discuss the requirements that have been captured.
Thanks
Chris
Call Info
12 matches
Mail list logo