Wouldn't it make more sense to downgrade/install 2.4.2 in that case?
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Oliver Mangold
oliver.mang...@emea.nec.comwrote:
Hello,
we installed Lustre 2.5.0 servers at a customer site and ran into
massive stability problems. Because of this we would like to
We weren't able to use lustre (2.4.2/2.5.x) with kernel 3.12.4 (staging
kernel driver - kernel panics on mount)
After compiling 3.13-rc we have a working system (though it has not yet
being put through its' paces except for some simultaneous dd)
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 5:02 PM, E.S. Rosenberg
Hello!
On Jan 8, 2014, at 9:58 AM, Oliver Mangold wrote:
Lustre: MGS MGS started
LustreError: 5476:0:(mgc_request.c:76:mgc_name2resid()) missing name:
-sptlrpc
Lustre: 5528:0:(ldlm_lib.c:952:target_handle_connect()) MGS: connection
LustreError: 5476:0:(mgc_request.c:286:config_log_add())
On 08.01.2014 16:02, E.S. Rosenberg wrote:
Wouldn't it make more sense to downgrade/install 2.4.2 in that case?
Might consider it, if I run out of other options, but the little experience I
had with the 2.4 series didn't leave a good impression with me concerning
stability. I would prefer 2.1.6
On Jan 8, 2014, at 10:15 AM, Oliver Mangold wrote:
Is this some sort of kerberos enabled deployment?
No nothing like that. Even group upcall is disabled.
There's all this sptlrpc chatter coming out from somewhere that should not be
there.
I suspect there might be a bad entry in your mgs
On 08.01.2014 16:35, Drokin, Oleg wrote:
On Jan 8, 2014, at 10:15 AM, Oliver Mangold wrote:
Is this some sort of kerberos enabled deployment?
No nothing like that. Even group upcall is disabled.
There's all this sptlrpc chatter coming out from somewhere that should not be
there.
I suspect
Hello OpenSFS participants,
Do you have opinions and suggestions for this year's LUG event? If so, we'd
love your input!
OpenSFS is forming the LUG 2014 planning committee and we're calling for
participants! The LUG planning committee is a vital group of volunteers
responsible for
