Re: [lustre-discuss] rpm names?

A presentation at LUG 2016 given by Chris Morrone gives some background on the new packaging conventions. http://cdn.opensfs.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/LUG2016D1_Improved-Versioning_Morrone_DiNatale.pdf https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=50VN9Q7BHYA=5=PLA5dHg1_l3V8r6eqrUnl8DiB-KH1K5yLH With the

Re: [lustre-discuss] rpm names?

That work was done in LU-5614 and some related tickets. I think the one for removing the kernel version from the package name was LU-7643. Chris Horn On 4/21/17, 12:58 PM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Michael Di Domenico"

[lustre-discuss] rpm names?

i'm confused over the naming change between 2.8 and 2.9, it seems the kernel version has gotten dropped from the rpm filename. but the files inside the rpm are still compiled for a specific kernel, so there's a good chance that kmod-lustre-client will get installed on a machine that does not have

[lustre-discuss] module install dir

is there anyway to specify the installation directory for the kernel modules during the 'make install' step? on rhel7 by default it seems to push them into /lib/modules, but i want them to go to a completely different area the kmp-moddir switch seems to add a path to the end of the /lib/modules