Re: [lustre-discuss] new build/install no devices showing up

2017-04-28 Thread Bass, Ned
The first column in ldev.conf should match the output of 'uname -n'. If that fails, 'sh -x /etc/init.d/lustre start' is a good way to trace the startup process to see where it's going off the rails. Ned > -Original Message- > From: lustre-discuss [mailto:lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lus

Re: [lustre-discuss] new build/install no devices showing up

2017-04-28 Thread Brian Andrus
Yep. They are listed in ldev.conf: 10.1.1.1 - mgs zfs:lustre-mgs/mgs 10.1.1.1 - mdt0zfs:lustre-mdt0/mdt0 10.1.1.1 - ost0zfs:lustre-ost0/ost0 I haven't changed any options in /etc/sysconfig/lustre at all. Didn't see any that might be the source of the issue. Brian An

Re: [lustre-discuss] new build/install no devices showing up

2017-04-28 Thread Dilger, Andreas
On Apr 28, 2017, at 12:23, Brian Andrus wrote: > > All, > > I just did a new build against the latest (2.9.56_36) source. > > I am building with zfs support and kmod. Packages build fine and install fine. > > Lnet comes up and I can 'lctl ping' self and a client. Both show up as peers > after

[lustre-discuss] new build/install no devices showing up

2017-04-28 Thread Brian Andrus
All, I just did a new build against the latest (2.9.56_36) source. I am building with zfs support and kmod. Packages build fine and install fine. Lnet comes up and I can 'lctl ping' self and a client. Both show up as peers afterwards. I am following: http://wiki.lustre.org/Lustre_with_ZFS_

Re: [lustre-discuss] kerberised lustre performance

2017-04-28 Thread Sebastien Buisson
Hi, I have not specifically measured the performance impact of getting the Kerberos ticket before any Lustre request can be sent by the client. It happens at the first connection (so when mounting) and then when the ticket expires. Otherwise the ticket is cached. So unless the ticket has a very