Re: [lustre-discuss] KMOD vs DKMS

2017-07-18 Thread Rick Wagner
Hi Brian, I consider build processes somewhat fragile, especially when you expect to get the same results across a large number of hosts, like a set of Lustre servers. As a result, I favor building a single set of RPMs, testing them, and then pushing an update to the production servers. So

[lustre-discuss] KMOD vs DKMS

2017-07-18 Thread Brian Andrus
All, I have been watching some of the discussions/issues folks have with building lustre and I am wondering what the consensus is on the two approaches. Myself, I have been building my own RPMs for some time and it seemed to me that the general direction of linux was to move toward kmod and

Re: [lustre-discuss] Lustre 2.10.0 ZFS version

2017-07-18 Thread Riccardo Veraldi
you can use the dkms lustre package (build it from rpms) and get rid of kmod dependencies On 7/17/17 9:42 AM, Götz Waschk wrote: > Hi Peter, > > I wasn't able to install the official binary build of > kmod-lustre-osd-zfs, even with kmod-zfs-0.6.5.9-1.el7_3.centos from > from zfsonlinux.org, the