Re: [lustre-discuss] lustre 2.5.3 servers and lustre 2.10.4 clients?

I have a centos 7.4 with lustre 2.10.3 working fine against lustre server 2.5.29 (DDN), for a few months ___ lustre-discuss mailing list lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org

Re: [lustre-discuss] LNET Routing Question

Hello, I agree as others have stated that we would not expect the loss of a router to significantly affect the I/O destined for filesystems served by other routers, nor would we expect the I/O destined for non-routed filesystems to be affected. However, I can say that we have seen bugs in this

Re: [lustre-discuss] lustre 2.5.3 servers and lustre 2.10.4 clients?

Afaik no-one is testing that combination so no-one can say that for certain. HTH, Eli On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Chris Roome < chris.ro...@mpimf-heidelberg.mpg.de> wrote: > Hi lustre gurus, > > We have the MGS/MDT and OSSes on lustre 2.5.3 and we would like lustre > clients on CentOS 7.5.

[lustre-discuss] OSTffff created :-(

Dear all, we are running a Lustre 2.5.3 installation for a couple of years already. The devices come from the 3PAR SAN appliance. Our users asked us to enlarge the available disk space, so we exported two new LUNs to the OST servers. File systems have been created with: mkfs.lustre --fsname=lu

Re: [lustre-discuss] FW: Lustre 2.10.4 released

We may do a 2.11.1 for this purpose if there is sufficient demand but have no such plans at the time of writing. On 2018-05-23, 12:49 AM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Martin BALVERS" mailto:lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org> on behalf of martin.balv...@nutricia.com

[lustre-discuss] IO500 Call for Submissions for ISC 2018

IO500 Call for Submission Deadline: 23 June 2018 AoE The IO500 is now accepting and encouraging submissions for the upcoming IO500 list revealed at ISC 2018 in Frankfurt, Germany. The benchmark suite is designed to be easy to run and the community has multiple active support channels to help with

Re: [lustre-discuss] set_param permanent on client side ?

Hello Riccardo, There is “lctl set_param -P” command that set parameter permanently. It needs to be executed on MGS server (and only MGS must be mounted), but parameter is applied to given target (or client). From your example: lctl set_param -P osc.*.checksums=0 Will execute “set_param os

[lustre-discuss] lustre 2.5.3 servers and lustre 2.10.4 clients?

Hi lustre gurus, We have the MGS/MDT and OSSes on lustre 2.5.3 and we would like lustre clients on CentOS 7.5.1804. I did some testing with 7.5.1804 and 2.10.4.RC2 on a test client and had no problems (other than the "Lustre: Server MGS version (2.5.3.0) is much older than client..." warning

Re: [lustre-discuss] FW: Lustre 2.10.4 released

Will there be an update to 2.11 as well so it also works with RHEL 7.5? From: "Jones, Peter A" To: lustre-discuss Date: 23-05-2018 06:46 Subject:[lustre-discuss] FW: Lustre 2.10.4 released Sent by:"lustre-discuss" Missed lustre-discuss earlier - sorry On 2018-05-2